1981
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/27.3.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
250
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 715 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
250
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Westgard multirule quality control rules 1 3s , 2 2s , and 4 1s were applied to control results to detect random and systematic errors (Westgard et al, 1981).…”
Section: Quality Assurance Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Westgard multirule quality control rules 1 3s , 2 2s , and 4 1s were applied to control results to detect random and systematic errors (Westgard et al, 1981).…”
Section: Quality Assurance Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this exercise, the action limit was set at a single violation of the 3 standard deviation rule. General indications for possible problems were set at two out of three results exceeding the same warning limit, nine consecutive readings on the same side of the mean, or six consecutive readings showing a continuous rising or decreasing trend (Westgard et al 1981).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attempt has been made to apply the principle of Westgard Rules used for clinical chemistry (Westgard et al 1981) to microbiological control charts. The principles that work so well in clinical chemistry and serological assays (Gray 1994) may not all hold true for microbiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OD of individual control runs are plotted in the chart and compared with the standard deviation. When it exceeds the average ±2 SDs, this is considered as a warning for bad quality of the run, which can be rejected if additional criteria apply (Westgard et al 1981).…”
Section: Standardization Of Elisa Readingsmentioning
confidence: 99%