2010
DOI: 10.5121/ijcsit.2010.2508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi -Perspective Evaluation of MA and GA for Collaborative Filtering Recommender System

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model uses k-means clustering for user grouping and cuckoo search for the process of prediction. Other metaheuristic or evolutionary algorithm based recommendation systems include memetic algorithm and genetic algorithm based recommender system by Banati et al [17], PSO based recommender system [18] and fuzzy ant based recommenders by Nadi et al [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model uses k-means clustering for user grouping and cuckoo search for the process of prediction. Other metaheuristic or evolutionary algorithm based recommendation systems include memetic algorithm and genetic algorithm based recommender system by Banati et al [17], PSO based recommender system [18] and fuzzy ant based recommenders by Nadi et al [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such as, Li G. and Li L. (2012) [2], Shani G., D. Heckerman, and R. I. Brafman (2005) [3], Banati H. and Mehta S. (2010) [4]. On the basis of different technologies, CF system is mainly divided into two categories, one is based on storage, and the other is model.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering (Cf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We learned something from those few literatures, for example, Yang S. and Xue W. [4]. As for one class collaborative filtering problems, due to the active dataset rarely (sparsity), while the other two types of datasets, negative and missing datasets, are very confusing, it has many difficulties to future research.…”
Section: One Class Collaborative Filtering (Occf)mentioning
confidence: 99%