2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.165974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-parameter discrimination digital positron annihilation lifetime spectrometer using a fast digital oscilloscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best pulse smoothing method varies with the type of spectrometer. For the SiPM-based digital spectrometer, 5th polynomial fitting was the best method which reduced the noise influence on the leading edge part of the pulse [14]. The timing resolution of the scintillator detectors (σ t ) is described by equation (3.3).…”
Section: Timing Resolution Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best pulse smoothing method varies with the type of spectrometer. For the SiPM-based digital spectrometer, 5th polynomial fitting was the best method which reduced the noise influence on the leading edge part of the pulse [14]. The timing resolution of the scintillator detectors (σ t ) is described by equation (3.3).…”
Section: Timing Resolution Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curve fitting is the method of constructing the mathematical function which has the best fit to data points. Various studies have used interpolation or curve fitting to restore the leading edge part of pulses from radiation detectors, and the timing resolution varies depending on the type of pulse smoothing methods [6,14]. To find the best pulse smoothing method, we used four methods: linear interpolation, spline interpolation, 5th degree polynomial fitting, and Gaussian fitting.…”
Section: Digital Pulse Processing 231 Pulse Smoothing Methods and Bas...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Time resolution is improved with respect to the standard configuration, without decreasing the counting rate [ 62 ]. The introduction of ultra-fast digitizers has represented a real milestone in the PALS technique [ 63 , 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the estimation of PPC t using the current experimental setup is challenging. In the future, it is anticipated that a system with narrower time windows (<1 s) will be developed, incorporating more intense positron sources, including slow positron beams, [16][17][18] and enabling a more precise estimation of defect concentrations and decay parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%