2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective programming approach to 1.5-dimensional assortment problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These functions were used to define conical supporting surfaces in nonconvex analysis. One of the main application areas is the nonconvex vector optimization, where these functions were used to characterize efficient solutions (see e.g., [7,14,17,22,30,33]). Another application area of these functions is the single objective mathematical programming (see e.g., [11][12][13][25][26][27]) where the conical supporting surfaces were used to develop optimality conditions and algorithms for calculating optimal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions were used to define conical supporting surfaces in nonconvex analysis. One of the main application areas is the nonconvex vector optimization, where these functions were used to characterize efficient solutions (see e.g., [7,14,17,22,30,33]). Another application area of these functions is the single objective mathematical programming (see e.g., [11][12][13][25][26][27]) where the conical supporting surfaces were used to develop optimality conditions and algorithms for calculating optimal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient points corresponding to the obtained weights by using AHP and ANP have been calculated and the results compared. The conic scalarization method has also been applied to the 1.5-dimensional assortment problem with two objective functions by Gasimov et al [ 20 ]. In the study, the authors focused on the possible nonsupported or “hidden” efficient points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations a DM may not be sure whether all the efficient points corresponding to own preferences (weights) are found by using the weighted-sum scalarization. To overcome this drawback, Gasimov et al [ 20 ] proposed a way to obtain nonsupported efficient points based on the conic scalarization function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, the second objective function is not considered in the VRP literature previously. Earlier, the type minimization was considered in the literature, for cutting and assortment problems [12] and [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%