2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective optimization evaluation framework for integration of distributed energy resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study overlooked different DER constraints. In [40,41], the researchers studied the optimal operation of BESSs to minimize distribution losses and battery cycle loss by regulating the voltage, reducing losses and peak loads. However, the rates of charge and discharge of the BESS were not considered, which may pose a safety hazard.…”
Section: Cost Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study overlooked different DER constraints. In [40,41], the researchers studied the optimal operation of BESSs to minimize distribution losses and battery cycle loss by regulating the voltage, reducing losses and peak loads. However, the rates of charge and discharge of the BESS were not considered, which may pose a safety hazard.…”
Section: Cost Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losses were not included as part of the study. MOLP BESS, PV [40] A new formulation for optimal allocation and sizing of DERs and energy storage systems (ESSs) to improve voltage profile and minimize annual costs using a multi-objective multiverse optimization method (MOMVO).…”
Section: Cost Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamic stopping criterion is added to the algorithm to find more accurate Pareto solutions. The dynamic stopping criterion uses the C index [39] of the obtained solutions and will be explained in 4.4. The percentage of domination of the solutions at each iteration is compared to the predefined iteration number before.…”
Section: Multi-objective Sine-cosine Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the performance and the quality of the MOSSA results, comparisons have been made with MOEA/D and MOPSO for the same condition, parameters, and twenty algorithm runs. Since the Pareto optimal front for the proposed objective function and data is not known to make sure that MOSSA Pareto results are optimal solutions, the algorithms comparisons are based on the C index [36] and spacing metric (S metric) [37], [38].…”
Section: Multi-objective Algorithm Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%