2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0984-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective genetic algorithm for assembly line resource assignment and balancing problem of type 2 (ALRABP-2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this example, a feasible sequence, seq [1,2,6,8,3,4,5,7,9] are considered in distributing task to workstation. In evaluating the optimisation objective , the assembly tasks is assigned to workstations with the ct max constraint where the total processing time for tasks assigned to the workstation must not exceed the cycle time, set as C=10.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this example, a feasible sequence, seq [1,2,6,8,3,4,5,7,9] are considered in distributing task to workstation. In evaluating the optimisation objective , the assembly tasks is assigned to workstations with the ct max constraint where the total processing time for tasks assigned to the workstation must not exceed the cycle time, set as C=10.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, a valid feasible assembly sequences (seq), seq 1 [1,2,6,8,3,4,7,5,9] as in Figure 3 and two other sequence seq 2 [1,5,3,4,7,2,6,8,9] and seq 3 [1,3,4,7,2,6,8,5,9] are considered. For given, cycle time maximum for this assembly line is to be 10.…”
Section: Problem Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the scientific community has proposed numerous studies to adaptation to the incertitude of the market and the fast demand variations aiming to optimize and integrate different manufacturing problems, inventory and SCM so that in an agile and flexible way, it minimizes costs and attend efficiently the client's orders. (consult Bandyopadhyay and Bhattacharya 2014;Baud-Lavigne et al 2014;Diabat et al 2015;Ghiami et al 2013;Hiremath et al 2013;Haq and Boddu 2014;Kumar et al 2014;Mousavi et al 2013Mousavi et al , 2014Park and Kyung 2014;Sadeghi et al 2014;Triki et al 2014;Xiang et al 2014;Yao and Huang 2014;İnkaya and Akansel 15).…”
Section: Contextualization and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic profile is divided into two categories, one is the modeling study. For example, considering MMAL balancing in an uncertain environment, Rabbani et al [2] put the labor costs and overtime costs into the model; Triki et al [3] studied the compatibility between task elements; Consider the changes in product demand, assembly technology and technological progress, equipment updates and other dynamic changes, Wu et al [4] established a MMAL evolution balancing model. The second category focuses on the model solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%