International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/fuzzy.2010.5584294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with an interpretability improvement mechanism for linguistic fuzzy systems with adaptive defuzzification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the accuracy obtained by (22) is 96.1%, and similar results are gained if consequents are in the form (14), while accuracy decreases to 92.7% if rule weights are avoided. Therefore, the use of rule weights demonstrate a great power in improving per-formance, for both level I and II output, while fuzzy consequents enable to refine the output of level II.…”
Section: Application To Real Datasupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the accuracy obtained by (22) is 96.1%, and similar results are gained if consequents are in the form (14), while accuracy decreases to 92.7% if rule weights are avoided. Therefore, the use of rule weights demonstrate a great power in improving per-formance, for both level I and II output, while fuzzy consequents enable to refine the output of level II.…”
Section: Application To Real Datasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In particular, MISO systems with conjunctive implication are considered. Instead, the average number of firing rules [1][2][3] will be considered to assess the understandability of the inference process, and the opportunity of using rule weights [4,5,7,14] will be evaluated, since they reduce the system interpretability [7,14] but can greatly improve system performances [4,5].…”
Section: Interpretability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous work 51 , we used the minimization of the #R F and R W _AvR TG as an objective, but in the current study we only use the index R W _AvR TG . This is due to the fact that #R F will be also minimized when minimizing the interpretability index, because it includes the R W and uses the T L mechanism to reduce the number of rules (section 3.1.1), so when minimizing the R W through the interpretability index, the #R F will be also minimized.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,18,31,99]) and using multi-objective methods (see e.g. [57,85,86,100]). (c) Use of population-based algorithms to obtain interpretable systems (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%