2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective ant colony system algorithm for virtual machine placement in cloud computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
345
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 582 publications
(373 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
345
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the evaluation is shown by varying only the number of cores demanded by VMs while keeping other resource demands unchanged and as a result the evaluation is simplified to one-dimensional resource. Another recent work [16] proposed a multi-objective ACO algorithm to reduce resource wastage and power consumption in cloud data centers. This work considers two types of resources (i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the evaluation is shown by varying only the number of cores demanded by VMs while keeping other resource demands unchanged and as a result the evaluation is simplified to one-dimensional resource. Another recent work [16] proposed a multi-objective ACO algorithm to reduce resource wastage and power consumption in cloud data centers. This work considers two types of resources (i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16) using a probabilistic decision rule (Eq. 15) [line [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. If the current PM is fully utilized or there are no feasible VMs left to assign to the PM, a new empty PM is taken to fill in [line [14][15][16].…”
Section: Avvmc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the proposed MEGSA-VMM algorithm is compared with the other existing methods like the ACO [13], EGSA-1, EGSA-2 and GSA [20] regarding load, QoS, migration cost and energy. ACO is an optimization algorithm, which performs load balancing using the ant-colony concept.…”
Section: Methods Taken For Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Load balancing can be performed in two ways namely, distributed and nondistributed load balancing. In distributed balancing, load from the overloaded virtual machine gets distributed to the other virtual machines, whereas in the non-distributed load balancing, only one virtual machine is involved in load balancing [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our argumentation, we further investigated the listed publications with respect to the evaluation of QoS aspects and summarize the results in Table 1. [21] dynamic no spare capacity Rolia2005 [22] dynamic yes spare capacity Bichler2006 [23] dynamic no not explicitly considered Cherkasova2006 [41] dynamic yes spare capacity Stillwell2010 [19] static no not explicitly considered Xu2010 [66] static no not explicitly considered Speitkamp2010 [14] dynamic no quantiles of historical service demands Feller2011 [43] dynamic no not explicitly considered Gao2013 [67] static no not explicitly considered At first, Table 1 distinguishes between static and dynamic workload. If the optimization problem implicates a time dimension for service capacity demands, we consider the approach to be dynamic, following the classification by [43].…”
Section: Service and Component Capacity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%