2019 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icecce47252.2019.8940696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-model Framework for Evaluating Type of Speech Samples having Complementary Information about Parkinson's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 49 studies that used accuracy to evaluate machine learning models achieved an average accuracy of 90.9 (8.6) % ( Figure 4A ), ranging from 70.0% (Kraipeerapun and Amornsamankul, 2015 ; Ali et al, 2019a ) to 100.0% (Hariharan et al, 2014 ; Abiyev and Abizade, 2016 ; Ali et al, 2019c ; Dastjerd et al, 2019 ). In 3 studies, the highest accuracy was achieved by two types of machine learning models individually, namely regression or SVM (Ali et al, 2019a ), neural network or SVM (Hariharan et al, 2014 ), and ensemble learning or SVM (Mandal and Sairam, 2013 ). The per-study highest accuracy was achieved with SVM in 23 studies (39.7%), with neural network in 16 studies (27.6%), with ensemble learning in 7 studies (12.1%), with nearest neighbor in 3 studies (5.2%), and with regression in 2 studies (3.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 49 studies that used accuracy to evaluate machine learning models achieved an average accuracy of 90.9 (8.6) % ( Figure 4A ), ranging from 70.0% (Kraipeerapun and Amornsamankul, 2015 ; Ali et al, 2019a ) to 100.0% (Hariharan et al, 2014 ; Abiyev and Abizade, 2016 ; Ali et al, 2019c ; Dastjerd et al, 2019 ). In 3 studies, the highest accuracy was achieved by two types of machine learning models individually, namely regression or SVM (Ali et al, 2019a ), neural network or SVM (Hariharan et al, 2014 ), and ensemble learning or SVM (Mandal and Sairam, 2013 ). The per-study highest accuracy was achieved with SVM in 23 studies (39.7%), with neural network in 16 studies (27.6%), with ensemble learning in 7 studies (12.1%), with nearest neighbor in 3 studies (5.2%), and with regression in 2 studies (3.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, large number of diagnostic systems have been developed for automated diagnosis of different diseases like Parkinson's disease [ 15 – 19 ], hepatitis [ 20 ], carcinoma [ 21 ], lung cancer [ 22 ], and mortality prediction systems [ 23 , 24 ] using machine learning, deep learning [ 25 ], data mining [ 26 ], and optimization methods [ 27 – 30 ]. Heart disease detection through machine learning is not an exception, and recently, numerous approaches have also been successfully implemented on various datasets for automated heart disease detection [ 31 – 37 ].…”
Section: Machine Learning For Heart Disease Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ey obtained best performance of 57.5 using LOSO approach. Recently, Ali et al [44] proposed a multimodal approach under the LOSO approach and obtained unbiased performance of 70% classification accuracy using time frequency features. e phone was kept at a distance of 10 cm from each subject during recording of the voice phonations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%