2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3321204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Method Approach to National Identity: From Individual Level Attachment to National Attachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These nation-building policies mainly emphasized ethnic homogeneity rather than civic inclusivity (Grigoriadis, 2009), leaving little room for the recognition of other ethnic minorities. The vague nature of the ethnic–civic dichotomy, coupled with exclusionary citizenship discourse (Aslan, 2007; Üstel, 2004) framed with a grandiose narrative (Ardag et al, 2019) that fosters othering (Sandal-Önal, 2021), causes doubts about the notion of Turkish national identity as a unifying force for all member of the nation. While the social psychological perspective emphasizes the importance of national identity for social cohesion and coexistence (Smeekes et al, 2012), the neglect of the nuanced content of the national identity within majority–minority relations in Turkey calls into question the normative framework underlying its conceptualization and measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nation-building policies mainly emphasized ethnic homogeneity rather than civic inclusivity (Grigoriadis, 2009), leaving little room for the recognition of other ethnic minorities. The vague nature of the ethnic–civic dichotomy, coupled with exclusionary citizenship discourse (Aslan, 2007; Üstel, 2004) framed with a grandiose narrative (Ardag et al, 2019) that fosters othering (Sandal-Önal, 2021), causes doubts about the notion of Turkish national identity as a unifying force for all member of the nation. While the social psychological perspective emphasizes the importance of national identity for social cohesion and coexistence (Smeekes et al, 2012), the neglect of the nuanced content of the national identity within majority–minority relations in Turkey calls into question the normative framework underlying its conceptualization and measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proclamation of the Turkish Republic in 1923 was accompanied by a strong nationalist sentiment based on the glorification of Turkish identity that was used to be considered as a common civic identity while it was also launched as the hegemonic ethnic category. Considering Turkish national identity as a hegemonic ethnoreligious identity that includes almost exclusively Muslim Sunni Turks (see Ardag et al., 2019; Ünlü, 2018; Taşdemir & Özkan, 2016), it is expected that a higher Turkish national identity would be associated with lower support for all kinds of pro‐minority attitudes (see Uluğ & Uysal, 2021), including lower support for pro‐refuge policies.…”
Section: Context‐dependent National Identity Populist Heritage and In...mentioning
confidence: 99%