2013 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon13) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2013.6586154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-look fusion approach to through-wall radar imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the assumption that the signal always perpendicularly propagates through the wall is feasible [18]. For simplicity, efficiency, and flexibility, a fixed time delay [obtained by (9)] is chosen to compensate for the wall effect according to the dynamic range of wall parameters (ε r , d ) for typical walls. Thus, the computation of the positions of ghosts and targets can be done under the assumption of free space after wall compensation, i.e.,…”
Section: Models and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the assumption that the signal always perpendicularly propagates through the wall is feasible [18]. For simplicity, efficiency, and flexibility, a fixed time delay [obtained by (9)] is chosen to compensate for the wall effect according to the dynamic range of wall parameters (ε r , d ) for typical walls. Thus, the computation of the positions of ghosts and targets can be done under the assumption of free space after wall compensation, i.e.,…”
Section: Models and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-view fusion approach is presented to implement rough imaging for all building walls. It performs a long-path synthetic aperture detection with a vertical view and two squint-views along with one building side [ 12 ]. Nevertheless, the long-path pass and the obscure imaging quality are issues that must be noted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed to the fact that targets radar cross-section (RCS) is much weaker than front wall EM backscatterings. Therefore, stationary targets cannot be generally detected without an effective removal of front wall clutter [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%