2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-01380-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-institutional observational study on the effects of three-dimensional radiotherapy and weekly 40-mg/m2 cisplatin on postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors

Abstract: Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with both three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) and weekly 40-mg/m 2 cisplatin on postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors. Methods We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional chart review of postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors who had been treated with both 3DRT and weekly 40-mg/m … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For high-risk patients, the OS, PFS, and p-PFS were 50.8%, 67.8%, and 71.6%, respectively, in the non-boost group. These results were consistent with previously published reports of OS and PFS, 27 , 28 and were significantly better than the 5-year OS, PFS, and p-PFS of patients without tumor bed boost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For high-risk patients, the OS, PFS, and p-PFS were 50.8%, 67.8%, and 71.6%, respectively, in the non-boost group. These results were consistent with previously published reports of OS and PFS, 27 , 28 and were significantly better than the 5-year OS, PFS, and p-PFS of patients without tumor bed boost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most common toxicities reported were low‐grade hematologic (anemia, leukopenia, or neutropenia) and gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea) toxicities. Notably, hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity are the most commonly reported adverse events among patients receiving standard‐of‐care, cisplatin‐based CRT, with 66% of patients experiencing some level of leukopenia (23% of which were grade 3 or 4) and 72% experiencing gastrointestinal events (12% of which were grade 3 or 4) 5,32 . In the current study, high‐grade (grade 3 or 4) anemia was experienced by 9% of patients, high‐grade leukopenia was experienced by 27%, and high‐grade neutropenia was experienced by 9%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The use of 3-dimensional RT techniques using concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 resulted in high rates of grade ≥3 acute hematologic toxicity and 19% acute lower gastrointestinal toxicity, but comparable 3-year OS of 90% and LC of 88%. 21 The application of advanced and widespread pelvic IMRT techniques as used in our study, however, can lower the rates of hematologic toxicity without diminishing the oncologic outcome. The RTOG 0418 trial of Klopp et al 44 investigated the impact of the RT dose on the hematopoietic stem cell compartment and found an improved bone marrow sparing in a group of women who received postoperative RCHT and radiotherapy for cervical (n = 40) and endometrial cancer (n = 43) to be significantly associated with lower rates of hematotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“… 18 , 19 The addition of postoperative concurrent chemotherapy showed significantly improved progression-free and OS in the adjuvant high-risk setting in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG 109) trial, and concurrent cisplatin-based schemes are currently the standard of care as it has the least toxicity among various chemotherapy regimens. 19 21 Nevertheless, there is evidence that only patients with multiple lymph nodes or histologic subtype of squamous cell carcinoma may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. 12 , 22 The assessment of risk factors remains controversial and heterogeneous, and the STARS trial 23 further questions the sequence of the optimal chemotherapy administration, preferring a sequential application more than concurrent regimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%