2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi gene sequence-based phylogeny of the Musaceae (banana) family

Abstract: BackgroundThe classification of the Musaceae (banana) family species and their phylogenetic inter-relationships remain controversial, in part due to limited nucleotide information to complement the morphological and physiological characters. In this work the evolutionary relationships within the Musaceae family were studied using 13 species and DNA sequences obtained from a set of 19 unlinked nuclear genes.ResultsThe 19 gene sequences represented a sample of ~16 kb of genome sequence (~73% intronic). The seque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
59
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(111 reference statements)
15
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest similarity of repeats within the groups of M. beccarii / M. textilis and M. acuminata / M. ornata or M. acuminata / M. ornata / M. balbisiana are in agreement with previous results that showed close phylogenetic relationships of these species [6], [8], [46] and support the new taxonomy of Musaceae [9]. In general, sequence and quantitative differences were proportional to diversification of species of the Musaceae family (compare Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The highest similarity of repeats within the groups of M. beccarii / M. textilis and M. acuminata / M. ornata or M. acuminata / M. ornata / M. balbisiana are in agreement with previous results that showed close phylogenetic relationships of these species [6], [8], [46] and support the new taxonomy of Musaceae [9]. In general, sequence and quantitative differences were proportional to diversification of species of the Musaceae family (compare Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Judging from the cluster analysis based on Neighbor Joining method, there are no A or B genome-specific satellite units in Musa (Figure 2B). These findings indicate that both satellites originated before the divergence of the section Eumusa (∼28 Mya) [66] and that their sequences remained conserved during speciation. Unfortunately, our observation means that the satellites are not suitable as FISH probes to discriminate A and B genome chromosomes and hence cannot help in characterizing genomic constitution in interspecific Musa hybrids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Otherwise, it is difficult to ascertain whether the similarity observed in the pair of sequences is an inherited trait from a common ancestor, or a homoplasy [14,19]. The level of substitution saturation in rpo genes was measured by comparing the number of transitions and transversions with the size of the genetic distance for each pair of sequences (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%