2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-dimensional liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry approach combined with computational data processing for the comprehensive characterization of the multicomponents from Cuscuta chinensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different types of silica gel cores were utilized, each with a unique bonding technique and bonding group (Table S3). Primarily, principal component analysis (PCA) modeling was used to intuitively reflect the overall separation difference on various licorice components among the 20 tested columns, taking the relative retention time ([retention time – dead time]/[effective elution time – dead time]) of 68 components as the index. , As shown in Figure A, 14 columns were gathered near the core point. However, the other six columns (including Cosmocore C18, CSH Cyano, HSS C18 SB, CSH Fluoro-Phenyl, XCharge C18, and Atlantis Premier BEH C18AX) exhibited significant separation differences on the licorice components with those 14 ones.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different types of silica gel cores were utilized, each with a unique bonding technique and bonding group (Table S3). Primarily, principal component analysis (PCA) modeling was used to intuitively reflect the overall separation difference on various licorice components among the 20 tested columns, taking the relative retention time ([retention time – dead time]/[effective elution time – dead time]) of 68 components as the index. , As shown in Figure A, 14 columns were gathered near the core point. However, the other six columns (including Cosmocore C18, CSH Cyano, HSS C18 SB, CSH Fluoro-Phenyl, XCharge C18, and Atlantis Premier BEH C18AX) exhibited significant separation differences on the licorice components with those 14 ones.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the data analysis and structural characterization based on the 6550 QTOF mass spectrometer were conducted in the manual mode . while more intelligent automatic peak annotation workflows were available by using the UNIFI software to process the data acquired on the Vion IM-QTOF mass spectrometer. , Ultimately, we could characterize 618 (Table S11) and 668 (Table S12) compounds from three Glycyrrhiza species by methods 1 and 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in the heat map, six groups of co-eluting components at 5.45, 8.40, 10.08, 12.55, 12.98, and 17.64 min, and six groups of isomers detected at m/z 1031.5445, 1139.5858, 961.5368, 799.4829, 1163.5855, and 679.4426 could be resolved due to the enabling of IM separation ( Figure 3 C,D). Thirdly, the hybrid scan approach could provide the CCS information, which displayed the potential for discriminating isomers [ 19 , 44 , 46 ]. Figure 3 E illustrated the CCS distribution and difference determined for six groups of isomers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Liu et al, AllCCS was used to predict the CCS of N ‐acylethanolamine (NAE) lipids in mouse brains to improve the reliability of isomer identification 38 . Comparison of the experimental CCS and predicted CCS values in some studies showed that the prediction error of AllCCS was higher than that of CCSbase, 160,167,168 while some studies showed improvement in reliability and data interpretation in isomeric metabolite identification, 169 and high correlation with experimental TW CCS N2 of mycotoxin 170 . Despite the higher prediction error found for some compound classes, according to da Silva et al, it is suggested to use AllCCS as the primary tool for confirmation because it has the highest coverage in CCS prediction compared with other tools and has a perfect Pearson correlation coefficient between experimental and theoretical CCSs 171 .…”
Section: Ccs Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%