2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-criteria decision-making framework for the location of photovoltaic power coupling hydrogen storage projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (2021) adopted the data envelopment analysis to screen the regions with the most potential to build a solar photovoltaic power plant in Taiwan and used AHP to determine the criteria weights. Gao et al (2021) introduced the social network diagrams and extended TODIM to solve the location problem of hybrid energy projects. Rezaei et al (2021) employed fuzzy VIKOR to determine the optimal wind-powered hydrogen refueling station.…”
Section: Ranking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2021) adopted the data envelopment analysis to screen the regions with the most potential to build a solar photovoltaic power plant in Taiwan and used AHP to determine the criteria weights. Gao et al (2021) introduced the social network diagrams and extended TODIM to solve the location problem of hybrid energy projects. Rezaei et al (2021) employed fuzzy VIKOR to determine the optimal wind-powered hydrogen refueling station.…”
Section: Ranking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many nations and locations, the value and fundamental workings of hydrogen energy still need to be clarified, and there are some circumstances in which producing, constructing, and utilizing it is more complicated than doing so with fossil fuels. The performance of hydrogen energy during the conversion, production, and storage has been extensively studied using the MCDM methodologies (Abdel‐Basset et al, 2021; Gao et al, 2021; Mostafaeipour et al, 2021; Wu et al, 2021; Xu et al, 2022). MCDM methodologies are increasingly used to resolve emerging conflicts and compare alternative scenarios concerning multiple conflicting evaluation aspects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way how these factors relate to assessing investment in energy projects is considered by multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDMM). Gao et al [ 20 ] highlighted four groups of factors—economy, environmental, social and risk, while Tao et al [ 21 ] mentioned the following groups under MCDMM: economic benefits, technical benefits, social benefits and environmental benefits. Thus, environmental factors are necessarily part of the assessment procedure and are closely interrelated with other groups of factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%