2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-232x.2002.00228.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-criteria approach to contractor selection

Abstract: This paper describes a multiple‐criteria decision support system (MCDSS) for the selection of the most appropriate contractor. The system can accommodate the unique characteristics of a project in addition to the qualifications and capabilities of those contractors assessed. The system first evaluates the list of contractors by matching their qualifications with specific project conditions. A short list of eligible contractors is thus selected and further the MCDSS compares the current capabilities of the shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach suggested by Al-Harbi (2001), Mahdi et al (2002) and Topcu (2004) used Analytical Hierarchy Process methods to select contractors. Shiau et al (2002) developed an sub-contractor selection management aid system.…”
Section: Multi-attribute Contractor Selection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach suggested by Al-Harbi (2001), Mahdi et al (2002) and Topcu (2004) used Analytical Hierarchy Process methods to select contractors. Shiau et al (2002) developed an sub-contractor selection management aid system.…”
Section: Multi-attribute Contractor Selection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…04018-p. 3 lot of research on DSS in planning has been conducted to date in construction management [14][15][16]. However, most of the models are impractical since they are complicated and difficult for a layman such as project managers to use.…”
Section: Iconcees 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers only concentrate on model development and discards important computer science fundamentals, e.g. software engineering, information management and human-centred computing [14,16,17]. Some researchers have attempted to adopt computing essence in their model development [18].…”
Section: Iconcees 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in transportation construction, this method was used by Huang et al (2003) to assess the competitive abilities of ports [9] and by Pearman et al (1989) to rank road investment programming [10]; the AHP method was utilized to evaluate the influence of constructing an expressway and the selection of contractors or procurement methods [11][12][13][14][15][16]. For the subject of budget allocation, Kwak & Diminnie (1987) resorted to a goal programming model to research the budget allocation of academic units [17]; Sundberg et al (1989) to explore the allocation mechanisms in public provision of transport and communication infrastructure [18]; Ramanathan & Ganesh (1995) applied the AHP method to resource allocation [19]; Perng et al (2007) used the Genetic Algorithm (GA) to solve the budget allocation in the restoration of historical buildings [20]; Han et al (2005) adopted a non-linear programming model to figure out the optimal financial budget for software development plans [21]; Karydas and Gifun (2006) applied multi-attribute utility theory to the budget allocation of the infrastructure renewal programmes on university campuses [22]; the governments responded to actual or potential investments in tourism development [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%