2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-continuum multi-phase parallel simulator for large-scale conventional and unconventional reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We implement the three coupled models in our in-house simulator. Our simulator is built on a parallel platform PRSI . PRSI is written by C language and Message Passing Interface (MPI), which is designed for large-scale reservoir simulation and provides a grid management module, a parallel input and output module, a linear solver module, a matrix/vector module, and a well management module.…”
Section: Numerical Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implement the three coupled models in our in-house simulator. Our simulator is built on a parallel platform PRSI . PRSI is written by C language and Message Passing Interface (MPI), which is designed for large-scale reservoir simulation and provides a grid management module, a parallel input and output module, a linear solver module, a matrix/vector module, and a well management module.…”
Section: Numerical Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous previous work, a few reservoir simulators and their numerical methods have been reported [21,31,33,32,61]. The simulators share similar methods, such as time discretization scheme, spatial discretization scheme, decoupling method, linear solver and preconditioners [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective linear solver and preconditioner methods have been proposed to accelerate the solution of linear systems from reservoir simulations, such as constrained pressure residual (CPR) methods [28,6], multi-stage methods [3], multiple level preconditioners [29] and FASP (fast auxiliary space preconditioners) [19,16]. Chen et al designed a family of CPR-type preconditioners, such as CPR-FP, CPR-FPF and CPR-FFPF methods [21], which have been applied to different simulations [32,22,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the initial water saturation of the shale gas reservoir is ultra-low, the fracturing fluid left in the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) results in a two-phase gas-water flow during shale production . Therefore, simulation approaches, including the finite difference method with local grid refinement, the embedded discrete fracture model, , and the finite element and control volume finite element methods (CVFMs) with unstructured grids, , have been developed to predict the production performance and optimize the production technique based on the occurrence of the two-phase gas-water flow. However, these models do not consider the fluctuations in the characteristics of the actual reservoir and the influence of two-phase gas–liquid flow in the wellbore on the production performance. , A large number of field tests were conducted using a mixture of oil, gas, and water, then three liquid holdup correlation curves and an empirical pressure drop model for two-phase vertical flow without distinguishing the flow patterns were obtained .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%