2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ce00639c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-component mass transfer rate based model for simulation of non-equilibrium growth of crystals

Abstract: A new model based on multi-component mass transfer allows the multi-component composition in crystals in any spatial location at any time during a crystallization process to be simulated. It can be applied to the estimation of the impurity content and to assessing the stability of crystalline pharmaceuticals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the literature, we selected the thermodynamically most stable facet for each metal-salt/metal-oxide surface, i.e., the (001) surface for NaCl, NaBr, KCl, KBr, and MgO, 38 the (110) surface for CaCl 2 and CaBr 2 (which preferentially adopts a stretched rutile crystal structure), 39,40 and the (104) surface for NaNO 3 . 41 We used the DFT-calculated lattice parameters for each slab model, which are in good agreement with the experimental lattice parameters for the respective material (see details in Table S1). For the NaCl(001), NaBr(001), KCl(001), KBr(001), MgO(001), and NaNO 3 (104) surfaces, we employed four-layer slabs in which the top two layers were allowed to freely relax and the bottom two layers were fixed in their bulk-truncated position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the literature, we selected the thermodynamically most stable facet for each metal-salt/metal-oxide surface, i.e., the (001) surface for NaCl, NaBr, KCl, KBr, and MgO, 38 the (110) surface for CaCl 2 and CaBr 2 (which preferentially adopts a stretched rutile crystal structure), 39,40 and the (104) surface for NaNO 3 . 41 We used the DFT-calculated lattice parameters for each slab model, which are in good agreement with the experimental lattice parameters for the respective material (see details in Table S1). For the NaCl(001), NaBr(001), KCl(001), KBr(001), MgO(001), and NaNO 3 (104) surfaces, we employed four-layer slabs in which the top two layers were allowed to freely relax and the bottom two layers were fixed in their bulk-truncated position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This choice corresponds to a (4 × 4) surface unit cell for NaCl, NaBr, KCl, KBr, and MgO, a (4 × 2) surface unit cell for CaCl 2 and CaBr 2 , and a (2 × 4) surface unit cell for NaNO 3 . Based on the literature, we selected the thermodynamically most stable facet for each metal-salt/metal-oxide surface, i.e., the (001) surface for NaCl, NaBr, KCl, KBr, and MgO, the (110) surface for CaCl 2 and CaBr 2 (which preferentially adopts a stretched rutile crystal structure), , and the (104) surface for NaNO 3 . We used the DFT-calculated lattice parameters for each slab model, which are in good agreement with the experimental lattice parameters for the respective material (see details in Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%