A Multi-City Community Based Smoking Research Intervention Project in the African-American Population

Darity, William A.; Tuthill, Robert W.; Winder, Alvin E.; Cernada, George P.; Chen, Ted T. L.; Buchanan, David; Stanek, Edward J.; Pastides, Harris

doi:10.2190/iq.26.4.b

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the seven studies evaluating smoking cessation, four had statistically significant results. Average post-intervention self-reported quit rate was 24% [44,76,77]. Studies shared similar intervention methods.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Control groups primarily received self-help material such as pamphlets. Mass media campaigns delivering print and electronic communication, including mediums like social media and news/radio stations, were commonly used to promote changes in smoking behavior [64,77,78]. In the church setting, scriptural messaging was the primary tool used to encourage smoking cessation [52,76].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States and African Americans (AA) have a disproportionately greater burden of CVD as compared to Whites. The American Heart Association (AHA) Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) framework outlines goals for attaining ideal cardiovascular health. Yet, there is a lack of evidence summarizing best practices to maximize LS7 attainment. The objective of the present study was to systematically review the extant peer-reviewed literature on community-engaged and community-based participatory research (CBPR) aimed at improving one or more LS7 metrics among AA. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched. We included articles that reported quantitative results for one or more of the following LS7 metrics: physical activity, diet, cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, and glycemia. We included analyses with a greater than 50% AA study population focused on adults (≥18 years of age). Results Of the 1008 unique studies identified, 54 met inclusion criteria; 27 of which were randomized controlled trials. 50% of studies assessed more than one LS7 metric but only two studies evaluated all seven of the LS7 metrics. No studies had a high proportion of AA males. 40 studies improved at least one LS7 metric at the study end-point. Formative research was used in many studies to guide intervention design. Studies were of varying quality, but overall rated “fair” using a modified approach to the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool. Conclusion There is insufficient data to recommend a specific community-engaged or CBPR intervention to improve attainment of LS7 metrics among AA. Future studies using rigorous methodology with increased gender diversity and utilizing the AHA LS7 framework are required to establish a validated program to improve LS7 in AAs.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A guideline for reporting the results of qualitative studies specifies that researchers' characteristics (including personal attribution, relationship with participants) should be reported because they influence the results [20]. Regarding personal outcomes (q3.3), some articles only reported that researchers held informal small group discussions [21,22]. If provided with this information, readers would gain a better understanding of the project including the CBPR process.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation

Kato

Kataoka

Suwangto

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a 2010 community-based participatory research (CBPR) reporting guideline on the quality of reporting a CBPR on smoking cessation. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases and included articles published up to December 2019 (PROSPERO: CRD42019111668). We assessed reporting quality using the 13-item checklist. Of the 80 articles identified, 42 (53%) were published after 2010. The overall reporting quality before and after 2010 was poor and did not differ significantly (mean difference: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.21 to 1.53). The total reporting scores of the studies did not differ significantly according to the effect size of the intervention (beta coefficient: −2.86, 95% CI: −5.77 to 0.04). This study demonstrates the need to improve the quality of reporting CBPRs. We recommend that journal editors endorse the CBPR reporting guideline to encourage its use by more researchers.

show abstract

Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults

Secker-Walker

Gnich

Platt

et al. 2002

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Multi-City Community Based Smoking Research Intervention Project in the African-American Population

Cited by 10 publications

References 4 publications

Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review

Community-engaged and community-based participatory research to promote American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 among African American adults: A systematic review

Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation

Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About