A multi-centre analysis of a decade of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery in Cheshire and Merseyside

Abstract

Background There are sparse data on the outcomes of endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouches. The Mersey ENT Trainee Collaborative compared regional practice against published benchmarks. Methods A 10-year retrospective analysis of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery was conducted and practice was assessed against eight standards. Comparisons were made between results from the tertiary centre and other sites. Results A total of 225 procedures were performed (range of 1.2–9.2 cases per centre per year). All centres achieved 90 per cent resumption of oral intake within 2 days. All centres achieved less than 2-day hospital stays. Primary success (84 per cent (i.e. abandonment of endoscopic stapling in 16 per cent)), symptom resolution (83 per cent) and recurrence rates (13 per cent) failed to meet the standard across the non-tertiary centres. Conclusion Endoscopic pharyngeal pouch stapling is a procedure with a low mortality and brief in-patient stay. There was significant variance in outcomes across the region. This raises the question of whether this service should become centralised and the preserve of either tertiary centres or sub-specialist practitioners.

Authors' reply

“…We thank Heng and colleagues for their interest in our study 1 and for the three main points raised in their letter to the Editors.…”

Letter to the Editors regarding ‘A multi-centre analysis of a decade of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery in Cheshire and Merseyside’

“…Letter to the Editors regarding 'A multi-centre analysis of a decade of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery in Cheshire and Merseyside' Z Heng 1 , H R Nieto 1 and S Ishaq 2 1 Departments of Otolaryngology and 2 Gastroenterology, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, West Midlands, UK Dear Editors, We read with great interest the paper titled 'A multi-centre analysis of a decade of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery in Cheshire and Merseyside' by the Mersey ENT Trainee Research Collaborative, 1 in your esteemed journal. We would like to commend the authors for their contribution to the overall limited knowledge available on the endoscopic treatment of pharyngeal pouches, and it is heartening to see the trainee collaborative model at play, involving six separate centres and adopting a common, pre-defined audit standard.…”

“…We read with great interest the paper titled ‘A multi-centre analysis of a decade of endoscopic pharyngeal pouch surgery in Cheshire and Merseyside’ by the Mersey ENT Trainee Research Collaborative, 1 in your esteemed journal. We would like to commend the authors for their contribution to the overall limited knowledge available on the endoscopic treatment of pharyngeal pouches, and it is heartening to see the trainee collaborative model at play, involving six separate centres and adopting a common, pre-defined audit standard.…”