2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01154.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi‐center randomized trial of buprenorphine–naloxone versus clonidine for opioid, detoxification: findings from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network

Abstract: The benefits of bup-nx for opioid detoxification are supported and illustrate important ways in which clinical research can be conducted in community treatment programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
190
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(24 reference statements)
15
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Published results indicate that buprenorphine performed favorably compared to clonidine in terms of both treatment retention and drug-free urine tests (Ling et al, 2005). Equally important, buprenorphine protocols were successfully implemented in both inpatient and outpatient settings, including treatment programs having little or no prior experience with medication-assisted detoxification or maintenance for opioid dependence treatment (Amass et al, 2004).…”
Section: Buprenorphinementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Published results indicate that buprenorphine performed favorably compared to clonidine in terms of both treatment retention and drug-free urine tests (Ling et al, 2005). Equally important, buprenorphine protocols were successfully implemented in both inpatient and outpatient settings, including treatment programs having little or no prior experience with medication-assisted detoxification or maintenance for opioid dependence treatment (Amass et al, 2004).…”
Section: Buprenorphinementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Buprenorphine reduces withdrawal symptoms and blocks the effects of opiates (Walsh and Eissenberg, 2003). Numerous clinical trials have evaluated the effectiveness of buprenorphine in comparison to placebo , clonidine (Ling et al, 2005;Gowling et al, 2004;Lintzeris et al, 2002), and methadone (Johnson et al, 1992;Johnson et al, 2000;Pani et al, 2000;Schottenfeld et al, 1997;Strain et al, 1994). Although buprenorphine may not be more effective than methadone, it has three key advantages: it does not require daily dosing (Amass et al, 2001), its chemical composition reduces the likelihood of diversion (Amass et al, 2000), and federal regulations encouraging its prescription by primary care physicians may facilitate its integration into community-based treatment programs (Amass et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTN protocols, moreover, documented the value of treatments that incorporate medications (Amass et al, 2004;Ling et al, 2005) and use motivational incentives (contingency management) to reduce use of stimulants among methadone patients (Peirce et al, 2006) and to increase retention in care among stimulant users in outpatient services (Petry et al, 2005). The CTN Workforce survey, therefore, included items assessing opinions toward the use of evidence-based treatments including manualized treatment, medications, mental health services, and motivational incentives as well as support for the use of confrontation and discharge for non-compliance.…”
Section: Evidence-based Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%