2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9132-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-center phantom study comparing image resolution from three state-of-the-art SPECT-CT systems

Abstract: No significant differences were observed between image resolutions when data acquired from different cameras were reconstructed with an independent algorithm. However, different manufacturers' reconstruction algorithms produced MWTs that differed by up to about 110% when using a set threshold of 50%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study was performed to assess the feasibility of an OSEM reconstruction algorithm and CT-based attenuation correction (Flash 3D), which has been reported to improve image quality and quantitation performance by applying compensation techniques for photon attenuation, Compton scatter and 3-dimensional depthdependent resolution [12,13,15]. First, we compared the impact of Flash 3D versus FBP on myocardial perfusion defect and severity quantification in 20 patients who had undergone both stress-rest myocardial perfusion SPECT and coronary angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was performed to assess the feasibility of an OSEM reconstruction algorithm and CT-based attenuation correction (Flash 3D), which has been reported to improve image quality and quantitation performance by applying compensation techniques for photon attenuation, Compton scatter and 3-dimensional depthdependent resolution [12,13,15]. First, we compared the impact of Flash 3D versus FBP on myocardial perfusion defect and severity quantification in 20 patients who had undergone both stress-rest myocardial perfusion SPECT and coronary angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that these systems performed differently in terms of quantitative accuracy, contrast, signal-to-noise, and uniformity. In a different study [34] in which they compared the same three SPECT/ CT systems, they showed that image resolution is very much dependent on the reconstruction algorithm. In recent years, various SPECT/CT and software vendors have responded to the increasing need for SPECT quantification and now commercially offer software packages for quantification of several radionuclides including 99m Tc, 111 In, 131 I, and 177 Lu [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the more pertinent publications include a simulation study of the convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood algorithms, (5) the estimation of the recovery coefficient based on hot spheres using OSEM, (6) and a comparison of resolution between different SPECT/CT systems using machine-specific reconstruction algorithms. (7) However, the detailed characterization of SPECT system resolution under varying imaging and OSEM reconstruction conditions across the field of view has not been performed. The objectives of this work are to characterize the behavior of the radial and tangential resolution of a SPECT/CT system under scatter and attenuation using OSEM iterative reconstruction as a function of: (i) location within the scan field of view; (ii) SPECT voxel size; and (iii) number of iterations and subsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%