2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-atlas based method for automated anatomical Macaca fascicularis brain MRI segmentation and PET kinetic extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, previous PET studies with test-retest data have shown a good reproducibility of radiotracer binding measurement (Costes et al, 2007; Ballanger et al, 2013). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, previous PET studies with test-retest data have shown a good reproducibility of radiotracer binding measurement (Costes et al, 2007; Ballanger et al, 2013). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Reconstructed volumes were 128 × 128 matrices of 0.32 × 0.32 mm 2 pixels in sixty-three 2.42 mm spaced planes. The extraction of tissue time-activity concentration curves from automated delineated regions of interest was made possible by the specific Macaca fascicularis brain atlas (Ballanger et al, 2013). The influx rate constant of 18 F-DOPA (Ki) was calculated by linearization of the graphical Patlak plot (Patlak et al, 1983) over 90 min post-injection using the cerebellum as the reference region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAS has also been employed for the segmentation of cortical and subcortical structures in MRI data from fetuses, neonates, and infants too (Gholipour et al, 2012; Gousias et al, 2008, 2010, 2013; Shi et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2014e; Li et al, 2014; Koch et al, 2014; Makropoulos et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2014d), in which the contrast inversion due to ongoing myelination complicates the segmentation. Another area of application of MAS has been the segmentation of brain MRI in animal studies, e.g., mice (Da et al, 2012; Ma et al, 2014; Nie and Shen, 2013; Lee et al, 2014a; Khan et al, 2014), rats (Lancelot et al, 2014) and non-human primates (Ballanger et al, 2013). Finally, there are also studies that have applied MAS to the analysis of diffusion brain MRI data of humans (Jin et al, 2012; Tang et al, 2014; Traynor et al, 2010), which requires specific strategies for the registration, atlas selection and label fusion steps, due to the nature of the data, which are typically described by directional functions defined on the sphere at each voxel.…”
Section: Survey Of Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a useful strategy to improve the robustness and accuracy of atlas-based segmentation. 11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] It is particularly effective and efficient when there are multiple images with manual labeling available as atlases such as in brain MR segmentation [15][16][17][18][19][20] and cardiac image segmentation. 11,17,21 Rohlfing et al 13 and Rohlfing and Maurer 14 studied different atlas ranking and selection methods for MAS and showed that the intensity-based similarity metrics between the warped atlas image and the target image were good criteria for atlas selection.…”
Section: A Challenges and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%