2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.842845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mouse Periodontitis Model With Humanized Oral Bacterial Community

Abstract: Increasing evidence suggests that periodontitis, characterized by oral dysbiosis, is a critical player in the progression of multiple systemic diseases in humans. However, there is still a lack of a proper mouse model of periodontitis with the colonization of human periodontitis-associated bacteria. We here established a new mouse periodontitis model by combining ligation of the second molars with application of subgingival plaques from periodontitis patients. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and Taxonomic class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vivo study addressed protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge in an hACE2 mouse model that was previously successfully used to demonstrate IgG-mediated protection. 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 Although this model is appropriate for demonstrating antibody-mediated protection from COVA2-15 and 2E8, the differences between the oral mucosal environment in mice and humans are such that we would not expect that this model could be used to illustrate any of the nuanced differences between different types of human antibodies. 61 , 62 We believe that the functional advantages of human SIgA mAbs are likely only to be discernible in vivo , at human clinical trials, in the context of a human mucosal environment and microbiome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vivo study addressed protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge in an hACE2 mouse model that was previously successfully used to demonstrate IgG-mediated protection. 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 Although this model is appropriate for demonstrating antibody-mediated protection from COVA2-15 and 2E8, the differences between the oral mucosal environment in mice and humans are such that we would not expect that this model could be used to illustrate any of the nuanced differences between different types of human antibodies. 61 , 62 We believe that the functional advantages of human SIgA mAbs are likely only to be discernible in vivo , at human clinical trials, in the context of a human mucosal environment and microbiome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the dominance of Staphylococcus species observed in mice was not found in the human oral microflora. 82 The regulation of human oral microbiota by EGCG should be further confirmed by oral-microbiome-humanized animal models or clinical investigations. Several limitations should be acknowledged in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the differences between mice and humans are not only genetic and epigenetic but are also related to the characteristics of their environment (Perlman 2016). There are also differences in the immune systems between mice and humans, and the PD-associated microbiota in mice differs markedly from that of humans (Bai et al 2022). Moreover, experimental PD induced by the silk ligure is an acute disease model and can be quite different from the etiological process of human PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%