Handbook of Motivational Counseling 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470979952.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Motivational Model of Alcohol Use: Determinants of Use and Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While not all studies in the subsequent three decades have found a difference between obese and normal weight individuals in response to external food cues (e.g., Nisbett & Temoshok, 1976;van Strien & Ouwens, 2003), many have confirmed Rodin's initial finding (e.g., Burton, Smit and Lightowler, 2007). More recent theoretical accounts have attributed the heightened responsiveness to food cues among the obese to (1) the activation of dysfunctional knowledge structures (i.e., schemas) which reflect an over-concern with food and eating (Cox & Klinger, 2004;Williamson et al, 2004), or (2) an excessive release of dopamine in the brain's reward system which serves to increase the reinforcing value (i.e., incentive salience) of food (Berridge, Ho, Jocelyn & DiFeliceantonio, 2010;Volkow & Wise, 2005). Common to these theoretical perspectives is the prediction that obese individuals selectively attend to food and eating stimuli, that is, they show an attentional bias for such stimuli.…”
Section: Biased Attentional Processing Of Food Cues and Modification mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While not all studies in the subsequent three decades have found a difference between obese and normal weight individuals in response to external food cues (e.g., Nisbett & Temoshok, 1976;van Strien & Ouwens, 2003), many have confirmed Rodin's initial finding (e.g., Burton, Smit and Lightowler, 2007). More recent theoretical accounts have attributed the heightened responsiveness to food cues among the obese to (1) the activation of dysfunctional knowledge structures (i.e., schemas) which reflect an over-concern with food and eating (Cox & Klinger, 2004;Williamson et al, 2004), or (2) an excessive release of dopamine in the brain's reward system which serves to increase the reinforcing value (i.e., incentive salience) of food (Berridge, Ho, Jocelyn & DiFeliceantonio, 2010;Volkow & Wise, 2005). Common to these theoretical perspectives is the prediction that obese individuals selectively attend to food and eating stimuli, that is, they show an attentional bias for such stimuli.…”
Section: Biased Attentional Processing Of Food Cues and Modification mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In particular, within cognitive-behavioural theories (Cox & Klinger, 2004;Williamson et al, 2004), this food-related bias reflects the activation of dysfunctional food schemas, which manifest as a preoccupation with food and eating. According to incentive sensitisation theory (Berridge, Ho, Jocelyn & DiFeliceantonio, 2010;Volkow & Wise, 2005), biased attentional processing of food cues in obesity is indicative of a heightened food reinforcement (i.e., a stronger motivation to eat), because of an aberrant brain reward system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the factors associated with alcohol use, drinking motives (DM) are generally considered as being the most proximal factors underlying drinking behaviours through which the influence of more distal factors, such as personality traits, are mediated (Cooper, 1994;Kuntsche, Knibbe, Engels, & Gmel, 2007). DM refer to the reasons for drinking alcohol and consist of two distinct dimensions (Cox & Klinger, 2004), namely valence (i.e., enhancement of a positive affect or reduction of a negative affect) and source (i.e., drinking to obtain an internal or an external reward). Crossing these two dimensions yields four distinct motives (Cooper, 1994): social DM (positive, external, e.g., drinking to make social gatherings more fun); conformity DM (negative, external, e.g., drinking to not feel left out); enhancement DM (positive, internal, e.g., drinking to get high); and coping DM (negative, internal, e.g., drinking to forget worries).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como resultado de la investigación existente sobre las EA, se ha recomendado incluir su evaluación en los programas de prevención y tratamiento sobre el uso y abuso de alcohol (Cox y Klinger, 2004). Existen varios cuestionarios para evaluar las EA (ver Camacho et al, 2013 para una descripción de las medidas existentes).…”
unclassified