1990
DOI: 10.1093/jee/83.1.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Moth Production Index for Evaluating Sugarcane Cultivars for Resistance to the Sugarcane Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Louisiana E. loftini is expected to inßict substantial revenue losses (ReayÐJones et al 2008), and the need to develop management strategies is becoming urgent. In addition to reducing injury and increasing yield, control tactics that reduce adult emergence could aid in managing area-wide populations (Bessin et al 1990a) and slow the expansion of this invasive pest. Our Þndings on a new monitoring method, an intervention threshold, insecticide efÞcacy, and early instar behavior relative to varietal resistance and sugarcane plant phenology all contribute, in addition to providing suitable irrigation and avoidance of soil salinity (ReayÐJones et al 2005, Showler andCastro 2010a), toward the advancement of increasingly effective E. loftini IPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Louisiana E. loftini is expected to inßict substantial revenue losses (ReayÐJones et al 2008), and the need to develop management strategies is becoming urgent. In addition to reducing injury and increasing yield, control tactics that reduce adult emergence could aid in managing area-wide populations (Bessin et al 1990a) and slow the expansion of this invasive pest. Our Þndings on a new monitoring method, an intervention threshold, insecticide efÞcacy, and early instar behavior relative to varietal resistance and sugarcane plant phenology all contribute, in addition to providing suitable irrigation and avoidance of soil salinity (ReayÐJones et al 2005, Showler andCastro 2010a), toward the advancement of increasingly effective E. loftini IPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar varietal differences have been reported for damage caused by other pyralid stem borers. Bessin et al (1990) reported seasonal differences in injury by sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.) among tested sugarcane clones that may have been due to resistance to stalk entry or antibiosis (larval survival). Pfannenstiel and Meagher (1991) reported signiÞcant differences among sugarcane varieties to injury by the Mexican rice borer, Eoreuma loftini (Dyar).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, Bessin & Reagan (1993) observed greater deadheart densities in 'CP 61-37' (D. saccharalis susceptible) than in 'CP 70-330' (resistant) during the spring. Cultivar resistance to D. saccharalis has traditionally been determined based on measures of mature stalk injury (% bored internodes), adult production (number of moth exit holes in stalks), and tolerance to injury (% yield loss relative to % bored internodes) (Bessin et al 1990;White et al 2008). When comparing 10 sugarcane cultivars with varying levels of resistance, White & Dunckelman (1989) found limited differences in D. saccharalis deadheart injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%