2000
DOI: 10.1137/s0036142999350929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mortar Finite Element Method Using Dual Spaces for the Lagrange Multiplier

Abstract: The mortar nite element method allows the coupling of di erent discretization schemes and triangulations across subregion boundaries. In the original mortar approach the matching at the interface is realized by enforcing an orthogonality relation between the jump and a modi ed trace space which serves as a space of Lagrange multipliers. In this paper, this Lagrange multiplier space is replaced by a dual space without losing the optimality of the method. The advantage of this new approach is that the matching c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
398
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 514 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
398
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these methods based on a standard Lagrange multiplier interpolation, a system of increased size containing both displacement and Lagrange multiplier degrees of freedom has to be solved. In this work, we follow a different approach using dual shape functions for the Lagrange multiplier, which were initially introduced in domain decomposition problems [19,45] and extended to contact problems in [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and recently reviewed in [29]. While dual mortar methods are meanwhile well-established in finite elements, the present work, to the authors knowledge, is the first application of dual basis functions in the context of IGA for both domain decomposition and finite deformation frictional contact.…”
Section: Dual Basis Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using these methods based on a standard Lagrange multiplier interpolation, a system of increased size containing both displacement and Lagrange multiplier degrees of freedom has to be solved. In this work, we follow a different approach using dual shape functions for the Lagrange multiplier, which were initially introduced in domain decomposition problems [19,45] and extended to contact problems in [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and recently reviewed in [29]. While dual mortar methods are meanwhile well-established in finite elements, the present work, to the authors knowledge, is the first application of dual basis functions in the context of IGA for both domain decomposition and finite deformation frictional contact.…”
Section: Dual Basis Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While dual mortar methods are meanwhile well-established in finite elements, the present work, to the authors knowledge, is the first application of dual basis functions in the context of IGA for both domain decomposition and finite deformation frictional contact. Dual basis functions are characterized by fulfilling a biorthogonality condition [19]  γ (1) c,h…”
Section: Dual Basis Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this mesh the finite dimensional space M lc δm ⊂ L 2 (Γ m ) is defined, and we also set M lc δ = m∈M M lc δm . In the present context the space M lc δm contains piecewise (discontinuous) polynomials of degree k λ in the interior of the trace and the polynomial functions of degree k λ − 1 on the first and last intervals of the discretization, [11,33,8]. The discrete version of problem (3) within this framework is:…”
Section: The Locally Conforming Approach With Hybrid Mortar Virtual Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, good results for the patch-test have been shown also in [3] exploiting the, so-called, segment-to-segment approach, coinciding with the Mortar method with penalty descriptions of the contact traction. Socalled dual Lagrange multipliers have been developed for non-frictional contact in Wohlmuth [7] allowing to condense degrees of freedom for contact traction. Using this approach, the frictional constraints should be carefully treated as a sequence of the Tresca type friction model, see [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%