2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphometric study of the human mandible in the Indian population for sex determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
40
6
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
40
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in agreement with many researchers [7,8]. Conversely, other researchers found that males showed statistically significant higher mean gonial angle values than females [9], and others did not find any statistically significant differences between both sexes [10,11,12]. It was found that respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was in agreement with many researchers [7,8]. Conversely, other researchers found that males showed statistically significant higher mean gonial angle values than females [9], and others did not find any statistically significant differences between both sexes [10,11,12]. It was found that respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The mean value of the diagonal length in male was greater than female but the p value was found to be greater than 0.05 (Table 1) Compared with Ongkana N et al [1] and Maneesha Sharma et al [11] who found that the males have significantly greater diagonal length than the females. Horizontal length (HL): Previous studies done by Anupam Datta et al [8], Maneesha Sharma et al [11] and Vinay G et al [13] found that the horizontal length of the mandible was significantly greater in males than in females (Table no.2 and 3).…”
Section: Diagonal Length (Dl)mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[20] found that the mean values of GA and RH were found to be greater in males compared to females but in the present study, GA values were greater in females than males and were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05), in agreement with previous studies. [2122]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%