1991
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199112000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Morphometric Analysis of the Fetal Craniofacies by Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples of individuals can be compared to the normal population and expressed in Z-scores to illustrate the deviation from 'normality' 1 . Escobar et al employed this method for ultrasound-derived cephalometric measurements 2,3 . The authors found that pattern profile analysis may have an additional value in the diagnosis of fetuses with mild abnormalities or abnormality patterns 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples of individuals can be compared to the normal population and expressed in Z-scores to illustrate the deviation from 'normality' 1 . Escobar et al employed this method for ultrasound-derived cephalometric measurements 2,3 . The authors found that pattern profile analysis may have an additional value in the diagnosis of fetuses with mild abnormalities or abnormality patterns 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different orbital and facial parameters have been measured in utero by antenatal ultrasound. (Escobar et al, 1990;Sivan et al, 1997;Roelfsema et al, 2007) The exact parameters as well as the gestational ages studied vary in different reports. Thus it is not practical to compare absolute fetal measurements from the present study with other ultrasound based studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various craniofacial and orbital fetal measurements at different gestational ages have been described. (Burdi et al, 1988;Denis et al, 1998;Diewert, 1985;Escobar et al, 1988;Escobar et al, 1990;Guihard-costa et al, 2003;Guihard-costa et al, 2006;Kragskov et al, 1997;Roelfsema et al, 2007;Sibert, 1986;Sivan et al, 1997;Wu et al, 2000). Most of these studies are ultrasound based and there are only a few reports based on fetal autopsies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is based on measurements derived from ultrasonographic standardized examinations of fetal craniofacial structures. Values obtained here were compared to the normative data by Escobar et al [1990] in order to calculate standardized Z-Scores for each craniofacial measurement from each subject. "This Z-Score represents the difference between the actual measurement and mean of that given value for the specific gestational age, divided by the age-appropriate standard deviation (Z = (x-X)/SD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%