2018
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20181778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A morphology and histological study of placenta in normal and diabetic pregnancies

Abstract: Background: The placenta is a vital organ for developing foetus, and it is also the most accessible organ of human body, pregnancy in a diabetogenic state by virtue of various physiological changes which cause insulin resistance. In normal pregnancy, glucose tolerance decreases by third trimester, though plasma levels of insulin increase. Aim was to study comparison of placenta of normal pregnancy with placenta of diabetic pregnancy and it the possible outcome of pregnancy.Methods: The present study was case-c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were conflicting with Bhanu et al 16 where central thickness of the placentas were significantly higher in GDM group (p < 0.001) than those their control counterparts. 16 In the current study diameter of placenta was almost comparable between the study groups (p=0.164) and it was not significantly different between the groups which was similar with a study done by Tandon et al 12 where the mean placenta diameter in non-diabetic group was 18.02±2.40cm, while in diabetic it was 18.09±2.50cm and this difference in placental diameter between nondiabetic group and diabetic group was not statistically significant (t=-0.10, p=0.92). 12 But the findings were conflicting with Bhanu et al 16 where placental diameter was significantly higher in GDM group (p < 0.001) than the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings were conflicting with Bhanu et al 16 where central thickness of the placentas were significantly higher in GDM group (p < 0.001) than those their control counterparts. 16 In the current study diameter of placenta was almost comparable between the study groups (p=0.164) and it was not significantly different between the groups which was similar with a study done by Tandon et al 12 where the mean placenta diameter in non-diabetic group was 18.02±2.40cm, while in diabetic it was 18.09±2.50cm and this difference in placental diameter between nondiabetic group and diabetic group was not statistically significant (t=-0.10, p=0.92). 12 But the findings were conflicting with Bhanu et al 16 where placental diameter was significantly higher in GDM group (p < 0.001) than the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, shape of the placenta was not influenced by pregestational diabetes or GDM with oval-shaped placenta being predominant in either But a study was done by Tandon et al 12 where the majority placenta shape was circularin both non-diabetic pregnancy and diabetic pregnancy which was not similar with our study finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation