2012
DOI: 10.1600/036364412x648599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Morphological Cladistic Analysis of the <I>Vriesea corcovadensis</I> Group (Bromeliaceae: Tillandsiodeae), with Anatomical Descriptions: New Evidence of the Non-Monophyly of the Genus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clade V supports the monophyly of the group V. corcovadensis , which was revised (Gomes‐da‐Silva and Costa, ) and shown to be polyphyletic in a cladistic analysis with a reduced taxonomic sampling of Vriesea compared with this analysis, and based only on morphological data (Gomes‐da‐Silva et al., ). On the other hand, this group was recovered as monophyletic in a morphological analysis of the genus by Costa et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clade V supports the monophyly of the group V. corcovadensis , which was revised (Gomes‐da‐Silva and Costa, ) and shown to be polyphyletic in a cladistic analysis with a reduced taxonomic sampling of Vriesea compared with this analysis, and based only on morphological data (Gomes‐da‐Silva et al., ). On the other hand, this group was recovered as monophyletic in a morphological analysis of the genus by Costa et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Among the about 280 spp. described in the genus Vriesea until 2012 (Gomes‐da‐Silva et al., ), 42 taxa (39 species and three varieties) of xeric habit that were placed in this genus based only by presenting with a petal appendage were transferred by Grant (, , , ) and Butcher () to Tillandsia . Based on the results of total evidence analysis performed for Vriesea , we can verify the absence of a phylogenetic and morphological relationship and disjunct (Fig.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though some morphological characters have been shown to be homoplastic (HornungLeoni & Sosa 2008;Almeida et al 2009;Gomesda-Silva et al 2012;Schulte et al 2009;Donadío et al 2014), many of them continue to be extremely important in the delimitation of taxonomic groups in Bromeliaceae (Hornung-Leoni & Sosa 2008;Almeida et al 2009;Gomes-da-Silva et al 2012), in contrast to the lack of molecular divergence in traditional analyzed fragments of DNA (Clark & Clegg 1990;Horres et al 2000;Schulte et al 2005;Faria et al 2004;Versieux 2009). Although intensive efforts have been made to search for new and informative DNA fragments together with the use of microsatellites (Versieux et al 2012) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP; Rex et al 2007;Louzada 2012), detailed studies of morphology are also necessary in order to reveal traits of evolution that might not appear in molecular phylogenies, and important for identifying morphological synapomorphies (Assis 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometric methods can be instrumental in discovering, documenting and analyzing morphological character and character states, and have become important tools for understanding similarities and inferring relationships in different groups of plants. Morphometric and cladistic analyses based on morphological characters have been carried out in a number of genera and families (Michelangeli 2000, Roalson et al 2002, Li and Conran 2003, Sonibare et al 2004, Gomes-da-Silva et al 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%