A morphological analysis of research literature on Lean Six Sigma for services

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the existing literature on Lean Six Sigma (LSS) for services, construct a morphological analysis (MA) framework and identify research gaps to point to future research possibilities and priorities. Design/methodology/approach The MA framework is based on literature review of 175 papers published from 2003 to 2015, across 67 journals recognised by Scopus or ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide 2015. A three-phased methodology is used by the authors, with Phase1 featuring a five-stage systematic review protocol to identify relevant journal papers for review; Phase2 presenting a framework for classifying the reviewed papers in terms of their fundamental, methodological, chronological and sector-wise orientations; and Phase3 constructing an MA framework on the classified papers and identifying the research gaps. Findings The MA framework constructed based on six dimensions, namely, organizational context of applications, desired outcomes, implementation systems, LSS tools and techniques, integration with other management philosophies and evaluation methods, involving 40 focused themes, has revealed 355 distinct research gaps as opportunities for future research. Practical implications This paper confirms the existence of substantial scope and points to specific topics for further research in the area of LSS for services. The findings demonstrate the gaps in academic research on the subject. In addition, the study also helps organisational leaders and practitioners to look at LSS from a holistic perspective in the services context. Originality/value The MA framework of the existing literature on LSS for services presents a unique, systematic effort to identify research opportunities. In addition, a five-stage systematic review protocol is proposed in this paper. This could be valuable to researchers and practitioners in enabling them to systematically review the literature on research subjects of interest to them.

A Bibliometric Content Analysis for Understanding 5g Technology: Promise, Challenges and Future Road Map

“…Literature review is considered as one of the higher level of research evidence in other empirical testimonies as there is an element of analysis Copyright © Authors ISSN (Print): 2204-0595 ISSN (Online): 2203-1731 and synthesis in it [19]. Systematic reviews, which are different from ad-hoc reviews, has been recognized as a scientific activity and are being applied in other areas such as production economics too [20], [21], [22]. Further, a threestage protocol of gathering relevant literature, analysis and synthesizing data and drawing meaningful implications, as suggest by Transfield et al, [18] was used for the study.…”

“…The bibliographic analysis method was used. This method uses co-occurrence networks which, represents quantitative content based literature data [22]. In recent state of arts this method is identified as an effective method to represent literature data graphically by dividing it into clusters, to explore the recent trends.…”

A Comprehensive Analysis of Healthcare Big Data Management, Analytics and Scientific Programming

“…Machine learning techniques and big data analytics are applied in the healthcare fields for risk management, clinical decision support, chronic disease detection, and for precision medicine using genomic information [134]. The authors presented Lean Six Sigma application for improvements of patients' satisfaction, processing errors in healthcare payer firm using Six Sigma, and services of Lean Six Sigma for morphological analysis of research literature [135]- [137]. Table 9 depicts the research work reported using big data analytics in the fields of healthcare.…”

How IJPR has addressed ‘lean’: a literature review using bibliometric tools

“…Typically, some lean Six Sigma cases that have been reported in the literature are applied in service settings, including financial service, healthcare and local government. Although service sector covers about 36% of the body of literature concerning Six Sigma, this percentage is rising (Gamal Aboelmaged 2010) and Lean Six Sigma is emerging as a fundamental part of process improvement in service (Sunder, Ganesh, and Marathe 2018).…”