2010
DOI: 10.1080/01431160903380664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo radiative transfer model of satellite waveform LiDAR

Abstract: We present a method and initial results for a model of the interaction of waveform lidar with a three-dimensional canopy representation. The model is developed from the FLIGHT radiative transfer model (North, 1996), based on Monte Carlo simulation of photon transport. Foliage is represented by structural properties of leaf area, leaf angle distribution (LAD), crown dimensions and fractional cover, and the optical properties of leaves, branch, shoot and ground components. Important characteristics of the model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large-footprint continuous waveform nature of GLAS data has been suggested to be sensitive to apparent canopy and ground surface reflectance values; that is, canopy returns reflect stronger or weaker than the ground [14]. Radiative transfer analysis partially corroborates these findings [15], but suggests a greater influence is caused by waveforms being more sensitive to within canopy scattering events, which may lead to less energy irradiating the ground surface [16]. Further compounding the misinterpretation issues, the non-uniform footprint energy distribution effectively irradiates targets with higher intensity at the footprint centre.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The large-footprint continuous waveform nature of GLAS data has been suggested to be sensitive to apparent canopy and ground surface reflectance values; that is, canopy returns reflect stronger or weaker than the ground [14]. Radiative transfer analysis partially corroborates these findings [15], but suggests a greater influence is caused by waveforms being more sensitive to within canopy scattering events, which may lead to less energy irradiating the ground surface [16]. Further compounding the misinterpretation issues, the non-uniform footprint energy distribution effectively irradiates targets with higher intensity at the footprint centre.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A photon, which is scattered in atmosphere or landscape at the (x,y,z) position, can irradiate the LIDAR sensor in directions within the solid angle  (x,y,z), defined by the sensor aperture area ALIDAR. The Monte Carlo (MC) photon tracing method is frequently used for simulating LIDAR signals [60,61]. It simulates multiple scattering of each photon as a succession of exactly simulated single scattering events, and produces very accurate results.…”
Section: Modeling Lidar Signal With Ray-carlo and Box Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute validation of MCRT models is difficult, because the effects of the radiative transfer model, vegetation models, and the sensor response cannot be separated from each other. Qualitative comparisons of real and simulated LiDAR data have been reported for space-borne instruments (North et al, 2010), but to our knowledge, quantitative comparisons for small-footprint airborne LiDAR have not been reported before. Our model has some uncertainties, which are related to possible errors in the vegetation modeling, exclusion of wave phenomena (interference, diffraction), improper knowledge on the scattering characteristics of the calibration targets in the hot-spot geometry, and to the simplified sensor model.…”
Section: Validation and Sensitivity Analysis Of The Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%