2011
DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2011.624572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo evaluation of carbon and lithium ions dose distributions in water

Abstract: The Monte Carlo codes show good agreement with experimental results for off-axis dose distributions. The disagreements in the Bragg peak region for the central-axis dose distributions imply that further improvements especially in the nuclear interaction models are required to increase the accuracy of the codes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen, the local dose at the TEPC center is generally 2-3 times higher than the TEPCmeasured and TEPC-simulated dose under the focused irradiation of this TEPC by 3 mm FWHM pencil-like beam. Our results suggest that a good agreement between measured and calculated doses can be obtained only by direct modeling of the TEPC geometry, and not by scoring the dose in simulations without TEPC, as done by other authors (Hultqvist et al 2010, Taleei et al 2011.…”
Section: Lineal Energy Spectra Inside the Water Phantomsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As seen, the local dose at the TEPC center is generally 2-3 times higher than the TEPCmeasured and TEPC-simulated dose under the focused irradiation of this TEPC by 3 mm FWHM pencil-like beam. Our results suggest that a good agreement between measured and calculated doses can be obtained only by direct modeling of the TEPC geometry, and not by scoring the dose in simulations without TEPC, as done by other authors (Hultqvist et al 2010, Taleei et al 2011.…”
Section: Lineal Energy Spectra Inside the Water Phantomsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Simulations with the PHITS code were done for a wallless TEPC (Tsuda et al 2010). The energy deposition inside and around 7 Li and 12 C beams in water were calculated with SHIELD-HIT and FLUKA codes (Hultqvist et al 2010, Taleei et al 2011), but without implementing the exact geometry of the TEPC detector and, respectively, without calculating y-distributions. The FLUKA code was also used to simulate responses of TEPC to various ions (Böhlen et al 2011), including y-distributions for TEPCs located on the beam axis inside a water phantom irradiated by 12 C beam (Böhlen et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 The nuclear interaction cross sections used in the code and the obtained dose profiles in tissue-like media for proton and heavier ion beams have been shown to be in good agreement with available experimental data. 18,26,27 The 1 H and 12 C ions with initial energies 160 MeV and 290 MeV/u, respectively, were transported through a cylindrical water phantom of 10 cm in diameter and 30 cm in length. The cylinder was divided into slabs of 1 mm thickness.…”
Section: A Calculations Of Dose Contributions From Primary and Secmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated carbon‐ion beams were of rectangular shape with a constant beam height of 2.0 cm full width at half maximum (FWHM), while the beam widths varied in the interval from 0.5 to 10.0 mm (FWHM). A Gaussian‐distributed spread in kinetic energy of the incident carbon‐ions of 1.0% and a beam divergence of 1 mrad was assumed, as in other similar studies . A water phantom, of size 200 × 200 × 200 mm 3 , was used as simulation geometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%