2013
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2012.695067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo comparison of panel unit root tests under factor structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three main second generation panel unit root tests are proposed by Moon and Perron [38], Bai and Ng (hereafter, BN) [39] and Pesaran [40], respectively. According to the Monte Carlo comparisons by Lin et al [41], the tests proposed by Pesaran are relatively robust, so we choose them in our empirical study.…”
Section: Panel Unit Root Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three main second generation panel unit root tests are proposed by Moon and Perron [38], Bai and Ng (hereafter, BN) [39] and Pesaran [40], respectively. According to the Monte Carlo comparisons by Lin et al [41], the tests proposed by Pesaran are relatively robust, so we choose them in our empirical study.…”
Section: Panel Unit Root Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We check the stationarity of the variables using nonstationary panel data methods [22][23][24][25][26][27]; in particular, according to [22,24], stationarity tests for series should be conducted before performing the panel regression; otherwise the regression may be spurious and this will result in misleading conclusions. And according to the Monte Carlo comparisons by [25,26], the second-generation panel unit root tests proposed by Bai and Ng [24] and Pesaran [28] are robust relatively, so we choose them in our empirical study. We found that both tests reject the null of unit root for the variables ℎ, , , V , , , , , 2 , 3 , , , and and are statistically significant at the 10% significance level, so we conclude that these variables are stationary.…”
Section: Analysis Of Empirical Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would also present a problem for the competing DE and AR(1) factor specific models. While much work has been done on the development of unit root tests for time series data (Im et al, 2003;Baltagi et al, 2007;Moon and Perron 2012;Westerlund and Larsson, 2012;Lin, 2013), to our knowledge, no tests have been developed for our context. That is, none are applicable to unbalanced, inconsistently-spaced multivariate repeated measures data modeled with a Kronecker product covariance structure.…”
Section: Data Applications and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%