2023
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2023.3235275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monolithically Printed Filtering Waveguide Aperture Antenna

Abstract: Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are optimized to keep f 0 at 10 GHz. In our work, 10,20 an aperture antenna based on waveguide cavity-resonator has been designed. It has been re-designed here (called Antenna-II now) for comparison purpose as shown in Figure 2B.…”
Section: Waveguide Aperture Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are optimized to keep f 0 at 10 GHz. In our work, 10,20 an aperture antenna based on waveguide cavity-resonator has been designed. It has been re-designed here (called Antenna-II now) for comparison purpose as shown in Figure 2B.…”
Section: Waveguide Aperture Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input resonator is excited by a standard WR-90 waveguide through a rectangular iris. Furthermore, the iris at the aperture of the open-ended waveguide resonator is utilized to match its complex admittance to the generator's real admittance across a wide BW [9,11,21].…”
Section: Waveguide Filtering Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design reported in [7] has a larger bandwidth than ours; however, there is no report of a TZ. In [11], TZs on both sides of the stopband are achieved at the expense of larger volume per resonator. Hence, this design is not suitable for applications which demand compactness.…”
Section: Fabrication and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations