2021
DOI: 10.3390/fluids6060229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monolithic and a Partitioned, Reduced Basis Method for Fluid–Structure Interaction Problems

Abstract: The aim of this work is to present an overview about the combination of the Reduced Basis Method (RBM) with two different approaches for Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) problems, namely a monolithic and a partitioned approach. We provide the details of implementation of two reduction procedures, and we then apply them to the same test case of interest. We first implement a reduction technique that is based on a monolithic procedure where we solve the fluid and the solid problems all at once. We then present … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the one for the rigid case. 47 For some application it may be important also to understand the effectiveness of the reconstruction as a function of the spatial coordinate x. For this reason, we have also computed the component-wise relative error field, which assumes the following expression:…”
Section: Reduced Order Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the one for the rigid case. 47 For some application it may be important also to understand the effectiveness of the reconstruction as a function of the spatial coordinate x. For this reason, we have also computed the component-wise relative error field, which assumes the following expression:…”
Section: Reduced Order Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach could also be integrated with a semi-implicit scheme for the treatment of the coupling conditions between fluid and solid. 47 Furthermore, the reduced method we used depends on the number of degrees of freedom of the high fidelity problem. Consequently, one possible development concerns the implementation of hyper-reduction strategies that guarantee a more efficient decoupling between the offline and online phases, in order to obtain a more significant speedup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A new form of two-way coupling FSI modelling for a three-dimensional model for an asymmetric serpentine was introduced by using COMSOL and an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) method [24]. The reduced basis method (RBM) was integrated with the FSI modelling approaches to solve the complicated coupled problems in a more efficient manner [25,26]. However, the focus should lie on implementation of a separate method into existing modelling techniques, especially remeshing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few comparative studies have been conducted to anticipate the aerodynamic and structural performance of the wing concerning the aeroelastic characteristics. Furthermore, limitations of the FSI modelling approaches have been found in previous studies [24][25][26]36], such as that the additional resources required to develop an code for specific problems which may take a substantial amount of time. Focus should also be placed on integration of the separate code into the existing coupling process between CFD and FEA and stability of the correlation of fluid and structural algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%