2014
DOI: 10.1111/irv.12272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A monoclonal antibody‐based immunoassay for measuring the potency of 2009 pandemic influenza H1N1 vaccines

Abstract: BackgroundThe potency of inactivated influenza vaccines is determined using a single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) assay. This assay is relatively easy to standardize, it is not technically demanding, and it is capable of measuring the potency of several vaccine strain subtypes in a multivalent vaccine. Nevertheless, alternative methods that retain the major advantages of the SRID, but with a greater dynamic range of measurement and with reduced reagent requirements, are needed.ObjectivesThe feasibility of an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation, but not always equivalence, between SRID potency and potency determined by alternative methods has been observed previously with most antibody-based assays, including our earlier work with influenza A H1N1 vaccines [22]. Our results in the present study indicated a relatively better correlation between SRID and B/Victoria mAb ELISA values than between the SRID and B/Yamagata mAb ELISA values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Correlation, but not always equivalence, between SRID potency and potency determined by alternative methods has been observed previously with most antibody-based assays, including our earlier work with influenza A H1N1 vaccines [22]. Our results in the present study indicated a relatively better correlation between SRID and B/Victoria mAb ELISA values than between the SRID and B/Yamagata mAb ELISA values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The assay setup was similar to that previously described12 and used four different H7‐specific capture mAbs. ELISA potency values were determined by comparing the binding of HA in the vaccine samples relative to the binding of the reference antigen standard that has an assigned value in μg of HA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potency ELISAs were performed as previously described 12. Purified capture mAbs were used at a concentration of 2‐4 μg/mL (determined empirically for each mAb to optimize antigen capture and minimize non‐specific background).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Universal antibodies that recognise all influenza subtypes have been described and used in an ELISA format to quantify HA, but these antibodies cannot distinguish influenza subtypes and may not be stability‐indicating because they bind HA under denaturing conditions 40. In other studies, strain‐specific mAbs have been used to quantify HA in capture ELISAs20, 41, 42; these assays are able to quantify each HA subtype antigen in multivalent vaccine formulations and are able to detect loss of potency in vaccine samples subjected to stress conditions. Another antibody‐binding platform under development as a possible potency assay uses panels of mAbs printed onto a slide format 43, 44.…”
Section: New Assay Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%