2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-011-9963-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A moment-based approach for nonlinear stochastic tracking control

Abstract: This paper describes a new stochastic control methodology for nonlinear affine systems subject to bounded parametric and functional uncertainties. The primary objective of this method is to control the statistical nature of the state of a nonlinear system to designed (attainable) statistical properties (e.g., moments). This methodology involves a constrained optimization problem for obtaining the undetermined control parameters, where the norm of the error between the desired and actual stationary moments of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the moment control method, system (17) is established. In order to achieve first and second moment tracking, the poles of the closed-loop system (19) should be placed at the left-half of the S-plane. In order to have stable closed loop system (19) with fast dynamics the closed-loop poles are considered at -5, -5.5, -5.8, -6, -6.5, -7, -7.5, -8, -9, -11, -12, -12.5, -13, -13.2 -13.5, -14, -14.5, -15, and then the following feedback gains are obtained using place(A 1 , B 1 , ploes) function in Matlab:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the moment control method, system (17) is established. In order to achieve first and second moment tracking, the poles of the closed-loop system (19) should be placed at the left-half of the S-plane. In order to have stable closed loop system (19) with fast dynamics the closed-loop poles are considered at -5, -5.5, -5.8, -6, -6.5, -7, -7.5, -8, -9, -11, -12, -12.5, -13, -13.2 -13.5, -14, -14.5, -15, and then the following feedback gains are obtained using place(A 1 , B 1 , ploes) function in Matlab:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods lead to inaccurate results. The second relates to the methods that control the nonlinear system's moments by obtaining the probability density function of the response . These methods lead to the solution of a set of complicated differential equations based on the Fokker‐Planck‐Kolmogorov differential equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we will deal with the discrete-time counterpart of (2) by discretizing the corresponding cost functions and dynamic equations. Moreover, in sections III, IV, we will utilize Polynomial Chaos theory to transform the stochastic optimal control problem in (2) (usually referred to as momentbased stochastic control problem; see for example [33], [34]) into a purely deterministic one.…”
Section: A Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to present, many methods have been proposed to deal with the filtering problem of the nonlinear timedelay systems, classically including the state augmentation, robust H-infinity filter [3,4], and particle filter [5,6]. However, it is well known that these methods inevitably face enormous computation burdens owing to the augmentation of the present state with the delayed states in the state augmentation method, to the hard computation of the matrix inequality in H-infinity filter, and to a large number of stochastic sampling particles for fulfilling the estimation accuracy in particle filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%