2016
DOI: 10.1515/biol-2016-0066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular survey of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in central-eastern Europe

Abstract: Open Life Sci. 2016; 11: 524-532 while infections with E. granulosus s.s. which are highly infectious for humans are more commonly encountered in Romania and Hungary.Keywords: Echinococcus granulosus, genotype, DNA sequences, human, pig, central-eastern Europe IntroductionThe larval stages of the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.) are the causative agents of cystic echinococcosis (CE), one of the most important cestode infections causing morbidity and mortality in humans and significant econ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicated a substantial role of livestock trade, which has facilitated the parasite dispersal over vast areas, in shaping phylogeographical G1 pattern. In connection with a single human sample identifi ed here as E. granulosus G3, a relatively high proportion of the G3 genotype (28.2 %, 46 of 163 isolates) in the samples typed as E. granulosus s.s. was before detected in Romania when markers with the G1-G3 resolution power were used (Bart et al, 2006;Badaraco et al, 2008;Maillard et al, 2009;Casulli et al, 2012;Mitrea et al, 2014;Šnábel et al, 2016). This genetic form was found in sheep, cattle and pig in the country, whereas the present fi nding provides the fi rst report of G3 in humans from Romania.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This indicated a substantial role of livestock trade, which has facilitated the parasite dispersal over vast areas, in shaping phylogeographical G1 pattern. In connection with a single human sample identifi ed here as E. granulosus G3, a relatively high proportion of the G3 genotype (28.2 %, 46 of 163 isolates) in the samples typed as E. granulosus s.s. was before detected in Romania when markers with the G1-G3 resolution power were used (Bart et al, 2006;Badaraco et al, 2008;Maillard et al, 2009;Casulli et al, 2012;Mitrea et al, 2014;Šnábel et al, 2016). This genetic form was found in sheep, cattle and pig in the country, whereas the present fi nding provides the fi rst report of G3 in humans from Romania.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Nevertheless, the authors stated that patients may have been infected with E. granulosus s. s. G1 outside Poland (Kazakhstan and Turkey, respectively), and thus they cannot be unambiguously regarded as indigenous. Hydatid cysts recently isolated from a patient in south-eastern Poland had homologous sequences to E. canadensis G7 (Šnábel et al 2016 ). Overall, a total of 62 autochthonous G7 human infections have thus been until now documented in Poland including this study, along with 40 G7 pig infections, one G7 infection in the European beaver and one G1 infection in sheep presently recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In central and northern Europe, E. granulosus s. s. (G1–G3 complex) is being detected only sporadically. Human autochthonous E. granulosus s. s. cases were recorded in Austria in two patients (Schneider et al 2010 ) and in Hungary in one patient (Šnábel et al 2016 ). In the latter human case originated from Békes county, the microvariant G1A identical to that seen in the present study was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The somatic antigen of E. multilocularis (AgEm) (Turčeková et al, 2004) was used to determine the presence of antibodies to E. multilocularis. Antibodies to E. granulosus s.l.…”
Section: Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibodies to E. granulosus s.l. were detected using antigen B (AgB) prepared according to Reiterová et al (2014) and crude antigens of sheep hydatid fluid (AgHF) prepared according to Turčeková et al (2004), with some modifications. Optimal dilutions for each antigen were based on the results of previous titrations, and the final protein concentration was 2.5 µg.ml -1 for antigens AgEm and AgB, and 5.0 µg.ml -1 for AgHF.…”
Section: Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%