1974
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5564(74)90028-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular sequence metric and evolutionary trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some methods, such as the "Distance Wagner" method of Farris (1972) there is no explicit quantity being optimized. Some authors (Farris, 1972;Beyer et al, 1974;Waterman et al, 1977) place an additional restriction on the fitted trees, namely that for all pairs of tips ij, if the triangle inequality for distances holds, the observed distance between tips A and B in Figure 1 must be less than or equal to the sum ofthe distances A-e and e-B.…”
Section: The Path Length Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some methods, such as the "Distance Wagner" method of Farris (1972) there is no explicit quantity being optimized. Some authors (Farris, 1972;Beyer et al, 1974;Waterman et al, 1977) place an additional restriction on the fitted trees, namely that for all pairs of tips ij, if the triangle inequality for distances holds, the observed distance between tips A and B in Figure 1 must be less than or equal to the sum ofthe distances A-e and e-B.…”
Section: The Path Length Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these original papers, a number of other distance methods have been introduced (Hartigan, 1967;Farris, 1972;Moore et al, 1973;Beyer et al, 1974;Tateno et al, 1982;Chakraborty, 1977;Sattath and Tversky, 1977;Waterman et al, 1977;Fitch, 1981). It is not my intention to review all of these methods here: I have described them briefly elsewhere (Felsenstein, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since early 1970s, (dynamic) time warping (DTW) has been widely used for sequence comparison in various areas, such as phonetic frequency sequences in speech processing [30,31], nucleotides sequences of DNA and RNA in molecular biology [32,33], strings of digits in computer science [34]. Kruskal [35] provided an overview of how widely DTW had been used.…”
Section: Dynamic Time Warpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a set of n taxa and the corresponding matrix D of evolutionary distances, the BMEP consists of finding a phylogeny for having minimum length (Catanzaro 2009). The BMEP is based on the minimum evolution criterion of phylogenetic estimation that states that if the evolutionary distances were unbiased estimates of the true evolutionary distances (i.e., the distances that one would obtain if all the molecular data from the analyzed taxa were available), then the true phylogeny would have an expected length shorter than any other possible phylogeny compatible with D. Interestingly, the minimum evolution criterion does not assess that molecular evolution follows minimum paths but states, according to classical evolutionary theory, that a minimum length phylogeny may properly approximate the real phylogeny of well-conserved molecular data, i.e., data whose basic biochemical functions have undergone small change throughout the evolution of the observed taxa (Beyer et al 1974). Because the selective forces acting on taxa may not be constant over time, evolution proceeds by small changes rather than the smallest change (Beyer et al 1974, Waterman et al 1977.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%