2018
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4424.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular phylogeny of the cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) with a review of tribe and subfamily classification

Abstract: A molecular phylogeny and a review of family-group classification are presented for 137 species (ca. 125 genera) of the insect family Cicadidae, the true cicadas, plus two species of hairy cicadas (Tettigarctidae) and two outgroup species from Cercopidae. Five genes, two of them mitochondrial, comprise the 4992 base-pair molecular dataset. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic results are shown, including analyses to address potential base composition bias. Tettigarcta is confirmed as the sister-clade o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
73
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two Massospora species treated in this study, Mt and Ml / Mp have cicada hosts both belonging to the subfamily Tibicinae, while the hosts of Md and Mc belong to two other subfamilies, Cicadinae and Cicadettinae, respectively (Sanborn 2013, Łukasik et al 2018, Marshall et al 2018 The results of the morphological study presented here indicate that spore measurements may not be useful for species level identifications. Unfortunately, the numbers of isolates sampled for many of these species were insufficient to confidently conclude whether differences truly exist.…”
Section: Massospora Diceroproctae Was On An Extremely Long Branch Relmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two Massospora species treated in this study, Mt and Ml / Mp have cicada hosts both belonging to the subfamily Tibicinae, while the hosts of Md and Mc belong to two other subfamilies, Cicadinae and Cicadettinae, respectively (Sanborn 2013, Łukasik et al 2018, Marshall et al 2018 The results of the morphological study presented here indicate that spore measurements may not be useful for species level identifications. Unfortunately, the numbers of isolates sampled for many of these species were insufficient to confidently conclude whether differences truly exist.…”
Section: Massospora Diceroproctae Was On An Extremely Long Branch Relmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Conidia are passively disseminated during mating attempts or flights, or possibly in crowded settings where high densities of cicadas promote close contact (Soper 1963, Cooley et al 2018. Cicadas infected by conidia develop secondary infections (Soper et al 1976b, Cooley et al 2018, resulting in the production of resting spores inside cicada hosts. These resting spores are incorporated back into the soil to infect new cohorts of cicadas as they emerge in later years (Soper et al 1976a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a robust and stable phylogenetic classification of a group has been established (e.g. Marshall et al 2018), the opportunity to coin vernacular names is also an opportunity to co-ordinate the folk taxonomy with the hierarchy of relationships that is inherent in the scientific classification.…”
Section: Naming Conventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the species list, relevant taxonomic literature (e.g. Distant 1906;Villet 1987Villet , 1989Villet , 1994Villet , 1997Villet and Reavell 1989;Marshall et al 2018) and experience, a taxonomic key to adult males of the subfamilies, genera and species of cicadas occurring in KwaZulu-Natal was drawn up. The identification of many species of cicadas relies on characteristics of the males' sound-producing organs and genitalia.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%