2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mokken analysis of the Dark Triad ‘Dirty Dozen’: Sex and age differences in scale structures, and issues with individual items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the Machiavellianism subscale of the Dirty Dozen is more strongly correlated with the SRP-III than with the Mach-IV (Carter, Campbell, Muncer, & Carter, 2015), which was also found in this study. Interestingly, contrary to previous work that suggests a stronger concordance between the Short-D3 and Mach-IV, the present study found that the relationships between Machiavellianism and delayed gratification were more similar for the Dirty Dozen and Mach-IV.…”
Section: Measurement Issues With the Dark Triadsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As such, the Machiavellianism subscale of the Dirty Dozen is more strongly correlated with the SRP-III than with the Mach-IV (Carter, Campbell, Muncer, & Carter, 2015), which was also found in this study. Interestingly, contrary to previous work that suggests a stronger concordance between the Short-D3 and Mach-IV, the present study found that the relationships between Machiavellianism and delayed gratification were more similar for the Dirty Dozen and Mach-IV.…”
Section: Measurement Issues With the Dark Triadsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, convergent validity with other Dark Triad measures and personality traits, predictive validity for relevant outcomes, and the appropriateness of modelling a common latent Dark Triad factor was shown (e.g., Garcia et al, 2017;Jonason et al, 2011;Jonason & McCain, 2012;Jonason & Webster, 2010;Küfner et al, 2014;Spurk et al, 2015). Besides these positive characteristics of the scale, recent studies also criticise the scale because due to its shortness the single subscales seem to not cover the whole breadth of the underlying Dark Triad sub-traits (e.g., Carter, Campbell, Muncer, & Carter, 2015;Jones & Paulhus, 2014;Maples, Lamkin, & Miller, 2014;Miller et al, 2012). This should be considered when interpreting the results about the Dark Triad sub-traits within this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its limited validity and psychometric limitations (Carter, Campbell, Muncer, & Carter, 2015;Maples, Lamkin, & Miller, 2014;Miller et al, 2012), we wanted to test the robustness of the correlations reported in Study 1 in another brief measures of the Dark Triad, the Dirty Dozen (Jonason & Webster, 2010). Participants were asked how much they agreed (1 ¼ Not at all; 5 ¼ Very much) with statements such as ''I have used deceit or lied to get my way'' (i.e., Machiavellianism), ''I tend to want others to admire me'' (i.e., narcissism), and ''I tend to lack remorse'' (i.e., psychopathy), and items were averaged together to create an index of Machiavellianism (Cronbach's a ¼ .76), narcissism (a ¼ .83), and psychopathy (a ¼ .83).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%