2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-017-1535-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Wenner Array for Efficient Use of Eight-Channel Resistivity Meters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They depict high resistivity zone (> 900 Ω-m) at a depth of 0 to 4 m and low resistivity (< 900 Ω-m) at a depth greater than 4 m. The tomograms produced using the conventional approach for the models with one offline electrode nearly match the true model except for a few instances (Figure 7e-g) that shows a very slight variation of anomalies. This close match of the tomograms is a consequence of the high signal-to-noise ratio of the array (Cubbage et al, 2017;Thabit & Khalid, 2016), whereas, the slight variation is likely due to the increase in offline electrode distance. However, the geometries of the true model are well resolved in all the tomograms obtained by using the new approach as shown in Figure 7b´-g´.…”
Section: Wenner Array With One Electrode Offline (Wa-1eo)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They depict high resistivity zone (> 900 Ω-m) at a depth of 0 to 4 m and low resistivity (< 900 Ω-m) at a depth greater than 4 m. The tomograms produced using the conventional approach for the models with one offline electrode nearly match the true model except for a few instances (Figure 7e-g) that shows a very slight variation of anomalies. This close match of the tomograms is a consequence of the high signal-to-noise ratio of the array (Cubbage et al, 2017;Thabit & Khalid, 2016), whereas, the slight variation is likely due to the increase in offline electrode distance. However, the geometries of the true model are well resolved in all the tomograms obtained by using the new approach as shown in Figure 7b´-g´.…”
Section: Wenner Array With One Electrode Offline (Wa-1eo)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ERT0 on the east flood plain was 228‐m long and used 77 stainless steel electrodes separated by 3‐m intervals, whereas ERT1–3 on the west flood plain were each 249‐m long and used 84 stainless steel electrodes separated by 3‐m intervals. The ERT data were measured with an Advanced Geosciences, Incorporated SuperSting R8 resistivity meter with accompanying 56‐electrode and 28‐electrode switch boxes using the standard Wenner electrode array configuration (Zhody et al., 1974) augmented by gradient array measurements (Cubbage et al., 2017; Rucker et al., 2021). The resistance measurements acquired during each individual ERT acquisition were filtered to remove anomalous noisy measurements (e.g., negative resistance values or values with large associated errors greater than 3% for repeated measurements), and subsequently inverse modeled in the RES2DINVx64 v4.06.23 software (Loke et al., 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the controller, there is also research into development of multi-channel systems as discussed by Loke et al [12]. An example of this is a more efficient method of using an 8-channel Wenner array by Cubbage et al [13]. In terms of data storage and processing, Automated Data Processing (ADP) has been used for soil data, according to the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey Manual [14].…”
Section: Other Research Into Development Of Resistivity Metersmentioning
confidence: 99%