A Modified Version of the Transactional Stress Concept According to Lazarus and Folkman Was Confirmed in a Psychosomatic Inpatient Sample

Abstract

BackgroundStress is a major risk factor for the impairment of psychological well-being. The present study aimed to evaluate the empirical evidence of the Transactional Stress Model proposed by Lazarus and Folkman in patients with psychosomatic health conditions.MethodsA structural equation model was applied in two separate subsamples of inpatients from the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine (total n = 2,216) for consecutive model building (sample 1, n = 1,129) and confirmatory analyses (sample 2, n = 1,087) using self-reported health status information about perceived stress, personal resources, coping mechanisms, stress response, and psychological well-being.ResultsThe initial model was created to reflect the theoretical assumptions by Lazarus and Folkman about their transactional stress concept. This model was modified until a sufficient model fit was reached (sample 1: CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.898, RMSEA = 0.072 [0.071–0.074], SRMR = 0.061). The modified model was confirmed in a second sample (sample 2: CFI = 0.932, TLI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.066 [0.065–0.068], SRMR = 0.052). Perceived external stressors and personal resources explained 91% of the variance of the stress response, which was closely related to symptoms of depression (63% variance explained). The attenuating effect of resources on stress response was higher (standardized β = -0.73, p < 0.001) than the impact of perceived stressors on stress response (standardized β = 0.34, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe empirical data largely confirmed the theoretical assumption of the Transactional Stress Model, which was first presented by Lazarus and Folkman, in patients with a wide range of psychosomatic conditions. However, data analyses were solely based on self-reported health status. Thus, proposed inner psychological mechanisms such as the appraisal process could not be included in this empirical validation. The operationalization and understanding of coping processes should be further improved.

Usability, Feasibility, and Effect of a Biocueing Intervention in Addition to a Moderated Digital Social Therapy-Platform in Young People With Emerging Mental Health Problems: A Mixed-Method Approach

“…Even though subjective measures have their obvious limitations, their merit lies in the ability to measure beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and attitudes about stress ( 69 ). Stress is not just the simple product of a perceived threat; according to the Transaction Model, stress is a product of the antecedent personal resources and external stressors, mediated by coping, followed by both short- and long-term effects ( 70 ). Studying the person-environment interaction and coping may provide additional valuable insight on the way these factors play a role in stress-reduction through biocueing.…”

Psychological Responses and Strategies Towards the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Higher Education Students in Portugal and Switzerland: A Mixed-Methods Study

“…The transactional model of stress by Lazarus and Folkman ( 8 ) served as the theoretical underpinning of the current study. It posits mutual interactions between people and their environment and suggests that the stress response is highly influenced by individual appraisal processes ( 9 ). This rationale underlies the interplay between physical, psychological, cultural, and social elements and their relationships with mental health, psychological well-being, and social functioning ( 10 ).…”

The Effect of Transformational Change on Performance: An Employee’s Stress Appraisals Perspective

“…As an important stress event, transformational change may lead to resource loss or profit of employees. Based on this logic, we focus on how change affects employees’ in-role performance and the role of the primary appraisal mechanism in this process, but do not pay attention to the secondary appraisal of the situation or personal resources as the influencing factor of coping strategies ( Obbarius et al, 2021 ). Future studies should incorporate the secondary appraisal into the empirical research framework.…”