1994
DOI: 10.1109/78.317852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified TLS-Prony method using data decimation

Abstract: This paper introduces a modi ed TLS-Prony method which uses data decimation. The use of data decimation results in the reduction in the computational complexity in a variety of applications by allowing several low order estimations to be performed rather than one high order estimation. We also present an analysis of pole variance statistics for the modi ed TLS-Prony method which is used to explain and quantify the characteristics of decimation. We show that using decimation we can obtain comparable performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analysis of both 1-D [47], [48], [39], [49] and 2-D [22], [43], [50] damped exponential estimators, and corresponding CR bounds [43], [51], are available. The "true 2-D" methods generally outperform the combined 1-D methods because they exploit the damped exponential structure in both dimensions simultaneously.…”
Section: A Damped Exponential Model 1) Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistical analysis of both 1-D [47], [48], [39], [49] and 2-D [22], [43], [50] damped exponential estimators, and corresponding CR bounds [43], [51], are available. The "true 2-D" methods generally outperform the combined 1-D methods because they exploit the damped exponential structure in both dimensions simultaneously.…”
Section: A Damped Exponential Model 1) Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we consider both damped and undamped exponential signal models, which have been used extensively for radar signal analysis [11], [24], [2], [3], [37], [22], [17]. For each of these reduced complexity models, we present the parametric form, relate the parameters to the scattering center attributes parameterized by GTDbased model in (8), bound the approximation error, review algorithms for estimating the model parameters, and highlight parameter estimation issues arising from use of the surrogate models.…”
Section: Reduced Complexity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subband approach may be seen as a pre-processing of the signal, and thus is independent from the method used for the estimation. In addition to their computational efficiency, these techniques present several other advantages comparatively to a fullband estimation [32,36,37]. In particular, it is known that data decimation (or downsampling) may increase the resolution capabilities of the estimator considered [38] and enables one to process signals at low signal-to-noise ratios [39].…”
Section: O S S I E Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last two aforementioned problems have motivated, last years, a renewed interest for subband-based approaches [30][31][32][33][34] that have been known for a long time in the signal processing community. The idea is to process a signal by splitting it into several small spectral windows.…”
Section: O S S I E Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation