2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified SAR protocol for optical dating of individual grains from young quartz samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving the background interval closer to the initial signal is more effective in reducing the contribution from slower components (see e.g. Ballarini et al, 2007), but we observed no dependence of the results on the interval chosen for background evaluation. Unless indicated otherwise, natural and regenerated signals were measured after a preheat of 10 s at 220°C; the response to the test dose (17.3 Gy) was measured after a cutheat to 180°C.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Analytical Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Moving the background interval closer to the initial signal is more effective in reducing the contribution from slower components (see e.g. Ballarini et al, 2007), but we observed no dependence of the results on the interval chosen for background evaluation. Unless indicated otherwise, natural and regenerated signals were measured after a preheat of 10 s at 220°C; the response to the test dose (17.3 Gy) was measured after a cutheat to 180°C.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Analytical Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…First, the fine-grain signals do show a greater proportion of the medium component to the initial (natural) signal. To decrease the consequences of this different proportion, it can be advisable to use an early background (EBG) subtraction for the finegrain samples (Ballarini et al, 2007;Cunningham and Wallinga, 2010). To test the effect of an EBG subtraction, we calculated fine grain ages using an initial signal of the first second subtracted by a background of the signal between 2 and 5 seconds.…”
Section: Discussion Of Osl Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard SAR protocol was applied on three samples, using blue stimulation for 50 s at 125 • C, a pre-heat of 240 • C and a cut heat of 220 • C. Equivalent dose (D e ) values were determined using the first 0.6 s of the OSL decay curve, and subtracting the background of the last 5 s. Another approach using the early background (EBG) subtraction method (Ballarini et al, 2007) with an integral of 0-0.4 s for OSL-signal determination and a background integral of 1.0-1.4 s, as described by Lowick and Preusser (2011), did not improve the dataset and was therefore rejected. The EBG subtraction did not change D e -values compared to those using a late background (LBG) subtraction but only reduced the signal intensity and increased uncertainties.…”
Section: Sar-osl On Fine Grain Quartzmentioning
confidence: 99%