2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.02.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified real coded genetic algorithm for constrained optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) and the parameter set to be estimated is given by the singleton a = {m}. Above optimization problem is solved using the genetic algorithm (LX-PM) [45,54,55] which is discussed in the previous section. Figures 18 and 19 illustrate the dynamics of the system (4) corresponding to the actual (reference) values and estimated values of the parameter, m, the prey reserve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) and the parameter set to be estimated is given by the singleton a = {m}. Above optimization problem is solved using the genetic algorithm (LX-PM) [45,54,55] which is discussed in the previous section. Figures 18 and 19 illustrate the dynamics of the system (4) corresponding to the actual (reference) values and estimated values of the parameter, m, the prey reserve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the number of function evaluations values obtained by other algorithms such as DE, RST2, SOMA, and SOMGA for all the three models, as reported in [50], LX-POL and LX-PM [51], and MDE algorithms [17]. It can be observed from Table 4 that SASOS provided better 8 Complexity results for all the three systems among all results quoted in [17], in terms of best objective values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…GAs for single the utmost common stochastic quest dealings [9]. It is naturally encouraged optimization plus search procedure settled by Holland.…”
Section: Genetic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%