2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-011-0607-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified model reference adaptive control with application to MEMS gyroscope

Abstract: Micro electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) are increasingly being used in measurement and control problems due to their small size, low cost, and low power consumption. The vibrating gyroscope is a MEMS device that will have a significant impact on stability control systems in the transportation industry. This paper investigates the application of a modified model reference adaptive control for MEMS gyroscope. Using this adaptive control algorithm, an estimation of the angular velocity and the damping and stiffne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It applies the MRAC scheme [20][21][22] to real-world systems. For the stability analysis of the system by the MIT rule, we needed a loss function J, often known as the cost function, which may be illustrated using [23][24][25][26][27],…”
Section: Mit Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It applies the MRAC scheme [20][21][22] to real-world systems. For the stability analysis of the system by the MIT rule, we needed a loss function J, often known as the cost function, which may be illustrated using [23][24][25][26][27],…”
Section: Mit Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It applies the MRAC scheme (Mukherjee et al, 2018b; Sethi et al, 2017) to real-world systems. For the stability analysis of the system by MIT rule, we needed a loss function J , often known as the cost function, which may be illustrated using (Fan and Kobayashi, 1998; Karthikeyan et al, 2012; Mfoumboulou 2021; Rothe et al, 2020; Zareh and Soheili 2011)…”
Section: Mit Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For robustness, H ${H}_{\infty }$ augmentation following inverse optimality theory is proposed. Similarly, different robustness modification techniques have been proposed in Ajel et al (2021), Fravolini et al (2020), Humaidi and Hameed (2018), Rothe et al (2020), Stepanyan and Krishnakumar (2012), Zareh and Soheili (2011), such as σ $\sigma $‐modification, e‐modification, Dead Zone, Optimal, data‐driven modifications including Projection operator to ensure bounded parameter estimation. Contrary to the control formulations proposed above, this paper's suggested controller combines feedback linearization with MRAC, an estimate of the disturbance, and an augmented tracking error‐based term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%