1963
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1963.00960040562004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modified Intermarginal Suture for Eyelid Lacerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1964
1964

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A specifically placed suture avoided any com¬ promise of healing surfaces by suture ne¬ crosis or granuloma and splinted the lacerated lid to the opposing intact lid margin. 4 In a recent symposium, senescent changes in eyelid tissues, paralysis of orbicularis muscle, and cicatricial bands were outlined as the chief pathophysiologic factors lead¬ ing to ectropion.0 The differences of inner¬ vation and function of the orbital and palpebrai portions of the orbicularis were emphasized in classifying the types of ectropion. The relative advantages of various established techniques of repair of spastic, senile, paralytic, mechanical, and cicatricial types of ectropion were described and illus¬ trated and utilized the experience-proved in¬ novations of each author.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specifically placed suture avoided any com¬ promise of healing surfaces by suture ne¬ crosis or granuloma and splinted the lacerated lid to the opposing intact lid margin. 4 In a recent symposium, senescent changes in eyelid tissues, paralysis of orbicularis muscle, and cicatricial bands were outlined as the chief pathophysiologic factors lead¬ ing to ectropion.0 The differences of inner¬ vation and function of the orbital and palpebrai portions of the orbicularis were emphasized in classifying the types of ectropion. The relative advantages of various established techniques of repair of spastic, senile, paralytic, mechanical, and cicatricial types of ectropion were described and illus¬ trated and utilized the experience-proved in¬ novations of each author.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%